Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Stakeholder opinions of implementing environmental management systems in the construction sector of the U.S

Beck Schildt, Jesse C.; Booth, Colin A.; Horry, Rosemary E.; Wiejak-Roy, Grazyna

Stakeholder opinions of implementing environmental management systems in the construction sector of the U.S Thumbnail


Authors

Jesse C. Beck Schildt

Profile Image

Colin Booth Colin.Booth@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Smart and Sustainable Infrastructures

Rosemary E. Horry



Abstract

Environmental concerns over the effects of construction sector activities necessitate meaningful measures to be taken. Despite worldwide increases in the uptake of environmental management systems (EMS), implementation of EMS across the construction sector of the U.S. remains slow. To date, stakeholder opinions about the uptake of EMS in the construction sector of the U.S. remain unexplored. The purpose of this study is to investigate the views of U.S. stakeholders towards the benefits and barriers of implementing EMS, and how these compare internationally. Underpinned by a positivism philosophy, an online questionnaire survey was used to collect the views of construction professionals (n = 50). Weighted average analysis scores reveal that the benefits of EMS are seen to improve the public perception and credibility of an organization/company and reduce waste levels and are a tool to improve the environmental standards of the U.S.’s construction sector; in contrast, the barriers of EMS are an absence of sub-contractor cooperation and resistance to change in existing company structure and policy, plus the requirement for additional employee training. The potential impact of this work demonstrates not only the role that the U.S. construction sector can play in advancing environmental and sustainability matters using EMS but also the obstacles that need to be addressed to enable their success. Understanding these benefits and barriers at an organizational level could enable them to devise more effective business strategies/policies, where evidence-based practices could be used to support EMS implementation.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 29, 2023
Online Publication Date May 9, 2023
Publication Date May 9, 2023
Deposit Date May 15, 2023
Publicly Available Date May 16, 2023
Journal Buildings
Electronic ISSN 2075-5309
Publisher MDPI
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 13
Issue 5
Article Number 1241
Series Title This article belongs to the Collection Construction Management – Future Innovations, Methods, Techniques and Technologies
DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051241
Keywords environmental sustainability; environmental impact; EMAS; ISO 14001
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10791960
Publisher URL https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/5/1241

Files






You might also like



Downloadable Citations