Jesse C. Beck Schildt
Stakeholder opinions of implementing environmental management systems in the construction sector of the U.S
Beck Schildt, Jesse C.; Booth, Colin A.; Horry, Rosemary E.; Wiejak-Roy, Grazyna
Authors
Colin Booth Colin.Booth@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Smart and Sustainable Infrastructures
Rosemary E. Horry
Mrs Grazyna Wiejak-Roy Grazyna.Wiejak-Roy@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Real Estate and Economics
Abstract
Environmental concerns over the effects of construction sector activities necessitate meaningful measures to be taken. Despite worldwide increases in the uptake of environmental management systems (EMS), implementation of EMS across the construction sector of the U.S. remains slow. To date, stakeholder opinions about the uptake of EMS in the construction sector of the U.S. remain unexplored. The purpose of this study is to investigate the views of U.S. stakeholders towards the benefits and barriers of implementing EMS, and how these compare internationally. Underpinned by a positivism philosophy, an online questionnaire survey was used to collect the views of construction professionals (n = 50). Weighted average analysis scores reveal that the benefits of EMS are seen to improve the public perception and credibility of an organization/company and reduce waste levels and are a tool to improve the environmental standards of the U.S.’s construction sector; in contrast, the barriers of EMS are an absence of sub-contractor cooperation and resistance to change in existing company structure and policy, plus the requirement for additional employee training. The potential impact of this work demonstrates not only the role that the U.S. construction sector can play in advancing environmental and sustainability matters using EMS but also the obstacles that need to be addressed to enable their success. Understanding these benefits and barriers at an organizational level could enable them to devise more effective business strategies/policies, where evidence-based practices could be used to support EMS implementation.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 29, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | May 9, 2023 |
Publication Date | May 9, 2023 |
Deposit Date | May 15, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | May 16, 2023 |
Journal | Buildings |
Electronic ISSN | 2075-5309 |
Publisher | MDPI |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Issue | 5 |
Article Number | 1241 |
Series Title | This article belongs to the Collection Construction Management – Future Innovations, Methods, Techniques and Technologies |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13051241 |
Keywords | environmental sustainability; environmental impact; EMAS; ISO 14001 |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10791960 |
Publisher URL | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/13/5/1241 |
Files
Stakeholder opinions of implementing environmental management systems in the construction sector of the U.S
(712 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
High street evidence - UWE - Written evidence (HSC0046)
(2024)
Report
Recycling English town centres – from retail to healthcare: surveys, views and next steps
(2023)
Journal Article
Embodied carbon reporting by German real estate institutional investors
(2023)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search