K. Kirby
The reality of advanced airway management during out of hospital cardiac arrest; why did paramedics deviate from their allocated airway management strategy during the AIRWAYS-2 randomised trial?
Kirby, K.; Lazaroo, M.; Green, J.; Hall, H.; Pilbery, R.; Whitley, G. A.; Voss, S.; Benger, J.
Authors
M. Lazaroo
J. Green
H. Hall
R. Pilbery
G. A. Whitley
Sarah Voss Sarah.Voss@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Emergency and Critical Care
J. Benger
Abstract
Background: AIRWAYS-2 was a large multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial investigating the effect on functional outcome of a supraglottic airway device (i-gel) versus tracheal intubation (TI) as the initial advanced airway during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. We aimed to understand why paramedics deviated from their allocated airway management algorithm during AIRWAYS-2. Methods: This study employed a pragmatic sequential explanatory design utilising retrospective study data collected during the AIRWAYS-2 trial. Airway algorithm deviation data were analysed to categorise and quantify the reasons why paramedics did not follow their allocated strategy of airway management during AIRWAYS-2. Recorded free text entries provided additional context to the paramedic decision-making related to each category identified. Results: In 680 (11.7%) of 5800 patients the study paramedic did not follow their allocated airway management algorithm. There was a higher percentage of deviations in the TI group (399/2707; 14.7%) compared to the i-gel group (281/3088; 9.1%). The predominant reason for a paramedic not following their allocated airway management strategy was airway obstruction, occurring more commonly in the i-gel group (109/281; 38.7%) versus (50/399; 12.5%) in the TI group. Conclusion: There was a higher proportion of deviations from the allocated airway management algorithm in the TI group (399; 14.7%) compared to the i-gel group (281; 9.1%). The most frequent reason for deviating from the allocated airway management algorithm in AIRWAYS-2 was obstruction of the patient's airway by fluid. This occurred in both groups of the AIRWAYS-2 trial, but was more frequent in the i-gel group.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 4, 2023 |
Online Publication Date | Feb 18, 2023 |
Publication Date | Mar 1, 2023 |
Deposit Date | Feb 27, 2023 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 27, 2023 |
Journal | Resuscitation Plus |
Electronic ISSN | 2666-5204 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 13 |
Pages | 100365 |
Item Discussed | N/A |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100365 |
Keywords | Emergency medical services; Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; Airway management; Paramedic Resuscitation; Advanced life support |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10473641 |
Publisher URL | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520423000085?via%3Dihub |
Files
The reality of advanced airway management during out of hospital cardiac arrest; why did paramedics deviate from their allocated airway management strategy during the AIRWAYS-2 randomised trial?
(256 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search