Adam Reuben
Elbow extension test to rule out elbow fracture: Multicentre, prospective validation and observational study of diagnostic accuracy in adults and children
Reuben, Adam; Appelboam, Andrew; Beech, Fiona; Lloyd, Gavin; Higginson, Ian; Dutson, Jane; Klein, Jason; LeRoux, Sally; Haig, Steven; Benger, Jonathan; Vickery, J.; Powell, R. J.; Taylor, R.; Saranga, S. S.M.
Authors
Andrew Appelboam
Fiona Beech
Gavin Lloyd
Ian Higginson
Jane Dutson
Jason Klein
Sally LeRoux
Steven Haig
Jonathan Benger
J. Vickery
R. J. Powell
R. Taylor
S. S.M. Saranga
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether full elbow extension as assessed by the elbow extension test can be used in routine clinical practice to rule out bony injury in patients presenting with elbow injury. Design: Adults: multicentre prospective interventional validation study in secondary care. Children: multicentre prospective observational study in secondary care. Setting: Five emergency departments in southwest England. Participants: 2127 adults and children presenting to the emergency department with acute elbow injury. Intervention: Elbow extension test during routine care by clinical staff to determine the need for radiography in adults and to guide follow-up in children. Main outcome measures: Presence of elbow fracture on radiograph, or recovery with no indication for further review at 7-10 days. Results: Of 1740 eligible participants, 602 patients were able to fully extend their elbow; 17 of these patients had a fracture. Two adult patients with olecranon fractures needed a change in treatment. In the 1138 patients without full elbow extension, 521 fractures were identified. Overall, the test had sensitivity and specificity (95% confidence interval) for detecting elbow fracture of 96.8% (95.0 to 98.2) and 48.5% (45.6 to 51.4). Full elbow extension had a negative predictive value for fracture of 98.4% (96.3 to 99.5) in adults and 95.8% (92.6 to 97.8) in children. Negative likelihood ratios were 0.03 (0.01 to 0.08) in adults and 0.11 (0.06 to 0.19) in children. Conclusion The elbow extension test can be used in routine practice to inform clinical decision making. Patients who cannot fully extend their elbow after injury should be referred for radiography, as they have a nearly 50%chance of fracture. For those able to fully extend their elbow, radiography can be deferred if the practitioner is confident that an olecranon fracture is not present. Patients who do not undergo radiography should return if symptoms have not resolved within 7-10 days.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 3, 2009 |
Deposit Date | Jan 21, 2010 |
Publicly Available Date | Dec 2, 2016 |
Journal | BMJ (Online) |
Print ISSN | 0959-8138 |
Electronic ISSN | 1756-1833 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 338 |
Issue | 7685 |
Pages | 31-33 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2428 |
Keywords | diagnostic accuracy, elbow extension test, elbow fracture |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/1000042 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a2428 |
Contract Date | Dec 2, 2016 |
Files
elbow.pdf
(107 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Think about the care in healthcare
(2014)
Journal Article
How do paramedics manage the airway during out of hospital cardiac arrest?
(2014)
Journal Article
Management of cardiac arrest survivors in UK intensive care units: a survey of practice
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search