Carfree, low-car - what's the difference
(2011)
Journal Article
All Outputs (51)
The paradox of intensification (2011)
Journal Article
Urban intensification as part of a smart growth strategy can facilitate low-energy transport modes and reduce overall car use, with benefits to the global environment, but evidence suggests the effect will be less than proportional. Hence, in locatio... Read More about The paradox of intensification.
The paradox of intensification (2010)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Intensifying cities, increasing their population density, reduces overall car use with benefits to the global environment, but also increases concentrations of traffic, worsening local conditions, unless it is accompanied by constraints on car owners... Read More about The paradox of intensification.
Carfree, low car - what's the difference? (2010)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
This paper aims to propose a definition and typology of carfree development and to assess the benefits and problems associated with it. It aims to contrast these with the concept and practice of ‘low car’ development.
Through a review of the litera... Read More about Carfree, low car - what's the difference?.
Potential for carfree development in the UK (2009)
Thesis
Rising car ownership and use has been associated with: pollution, resource depletion, waste of land, social exclusion and health problems. Carfree development is a relatively recent response to these problems in urban areas. There are several examp... Read More about Potential for carfree development in the UK.
Do randomised control trials offer a solution to 'low quality' transport research?
Presentation / Conference Contribution
This article responds to Graham-Rowe et al. (2011), which categorised 77 evaluations of transport interventions into 5 levels of ‘quality’. This article focuses on Graham-Rowe et al.’s treatment of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and their recom... Read More about Do randomised control trials offer a solution to 'low quality' transport research?.
Pedestrianisation and politics: A case study
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Proposals to pedestrianise or close roads to traffic are often controversial. This article analyses the impact of partial pedestrianisation, using a case study conducted in Brighton, UK. Before-and-after studies found a modest traffic reduction withi... Read More about Pedestrianisation and politics: A case study.
Does traffic really disappear when roads are closed?
Presentation / Conference Contribution
This article describes two studies which aimed to explore the impacts of pedestrianisation or road closures on traffic displacement, travel behaviour and the phenomenon of ‘disappearing traffic’. The first study surveyed residents whose travel route... Read More about Does traffic really disappear when roads are closed?.
Potential for carfree development in the UK
Presentation / Conference Contribution
This paper aims: to propose a definition and typology of carfree development, to assess the benefits and problems associated with it, to assess the potential demand for ‘European style’ carfree housing in the UK and the circumstances under which it m... Read More about Potential for carfree development in the UK.
Students car use and its effect on environmental attitudes
Preprint / Working Paper
This study concerns the relationship between students’ travel behaviour and their attitudes towards environmental issues. Previous studies have shown car use correlated with attitudes towards climate change, and with attitudes towards various policy... Read More about Students car use and its effect on environmental attitudes.
Evaluation of Brighton old town street improvements 2013-15
Report
In 2013, Brighton and Hove Borough Council commissioned the Centre for Transport and Society (CTS) at the University of the West of England (UWE) to evaluate the planned Old Town Traffic Improvement Scheme. Following a public consultation and a plan... Read More about Evaluation of Brighton old town street improvements 2013-15.