Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Clinical utility and acceptability of a whole-hospital, pro-active electronic paediatric early warning system (the DETECT study): A prospective e-survey of parents and health professionals

Carter, Bernie; Saron, Holly; Blake, Lucy; Eyton-Chong, Chin-Kien; Dee, Sarah; Evans, Leah; Harris, Jane; Hughes, Hannah; Jones, Dawn; Lambert, Caroline; Lane, Steven; Mehta, Fulya; Peak, Matthew; Preston, Jennifer; Siner, Sarah; Sefton, Gerri; Carrol, Enitan D

Clinical utility and acceptability of a whole-hospital, pro-active electronic paediatric early warning system (the DETECT study): A prospective e-survey of parents and health professionals Thumbnail


Authors

Bernie Carter

Holly Saron

Chin-Kien Eyton-Chong

Sarah Dee

Leah Evans

Jane Harris

Hannah Hughes

Dawn Jones

Caroline Lambert

Steven Lane

Fulya Mehta

Matthew Peak

Jennifer Preston

Sarah Siner

Gerri Sefton

Enitan D Carrol



Abstract

Background Paediatric early warning systems (PEWS) are a means of tracking physiological state and alerting healthcare professionals about signs of deterioration, triggering a clinical review and/or escalation of care of children. A proactive end-to-end deterioration solution (the DETECT surveillance system) with an embedded e-PEWS that included sepsis screening was introduced across a tertiary children’s hospital. One component of the implementation programme was a sub-study to determine an understanding of the DETECT e-PEWS in terms of its clinical utility and its acceptability. Aim This study aimed to examine how parents and health professionals view and engage with the DETECT e-PEWS apps, with a particular focus on its clinical utility and its acceptability. Method A prospective, closed (tick box or sliding scale) and open (text based) question, e-survey of parents (n = 137) and health professionals (n = 151) with experience of DETECT e-PEWS. Data were collected between February 2020 and February 2021. Results Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics and qualitative data with generic thematic analysis. Overall, both clinical utility and acceptability (across seven constructs) were high across both stakeholder groups although some challenges to utility (e.g., sensitivity of triggers within specific patient populations) and acceptability (e.g., burden related to having to carry extra technology) were identified. Conclusion Despite the multifaceted nature of the intervention and the complexity of implementation across a hospital, the system demonstrated clinical utility and acceptability across two key groups of stakeholders: parents and health professionals.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 2, 2022
Online Publication Date Sep 15, 2022
Publication Date Sep 15, 2022
Deposit Date Sep 8, 2022
Publicly Available Date Oct 17, 2022
Journal PLoS ONE
Electronic ISSN 1932-6203
Publisher Public Library of Science
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 17
Issue 9
Article Number e0273666
DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273666
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/9958808
Publisher URL https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0273666
Related Public URLs http://www.plosone.org/

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations