Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Towards good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher

Braun, Virginia; Clarke, Victoria

Towards good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher Thumbnail


Authors

Virginia Braun

Profile image of Victoria Clarke

Dr Victoria Clarke Victoria.Clarke@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Qualitative & Critical Psychology



Abstract

In response to the increasing use of thematic analysis (TA), and particularly the TA approach we have developed, in qualitative and mixed methods research published in IJTH, the editors of the journal have invited us to provide a commentary on good practice and common problems in TA research. The aim of this commentary is to guide researchers in producing and reporting methodologically coherent TA and reviewers in assessing what constitutes good practice, and ultimately to support IJTH in publishing high quality TA. This commentary is based on a review of 20 papers published in IJTH citing our work – typically Braun and Clarke (2006), the paper in which we first outlined our TA approach – with most authors claiming to have “followed” our approach, and a minority citing our work but using other approaches. It’s important to stress that our goal here is not to encourage or enforce strict adherence to the procedures we have outlined – or what has been dubbed methodolatry (Chamberlain, 2000) or proceduralism (King & Brooks, 2008), where procedures are prioritised over reflexivity and theoretical sensitivity. Rather, we want to encourage what we call knowing practice of TA. A knowing researcher is one who strives to “own” their perspectives (Elliott et al., 1999), both personal and theoretical, is deliberative in their decision-making, and reflexive in their practice of TA.

Journal Article Type Editorial
Acceptance Date Jul 22, 2022
Online Publication Date Oct 25, 2022
Publication Date Jan 1, 2023
Deposit Date Jul 23, 2022
Publicly Available Date Oct 26, 2023
Journal International Journal of Transgender Health
Print ISSN 1553-2739
Electronic ISSN 1434-4599
Publisher Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Peer Reviewed Not Peer Reviewed
Volume 24
Issue 1
Pages 1-6
Keywords thematic analysis; TA approach; Transgender; social construction; Big Q research
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/9722940
Publisher URL https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/wijt20

Files

Towards good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher (293 Kb)
PDF

Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is the author’s accepted manuscript of an original article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Transgender Health on the 25th of October 2022, The published version is available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597


Towards good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher (43 Kb)
Document

Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Copyright Statement
This is the author’s accepted manuscript of an original article published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Transgender Health on the 25th of October 2022, The published version is available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597







You might also like



Downloadable Citations