Are infinitival to omission errors primed by prior discourse? The case of WANT constructions

Kirjavainen, Minna; Theakston, Anna

Abstract

This paper examines the suggestion that infinitival to omission errors in English-speaking children can result from competition between two constructions (Kirjavainen et al. 2009a). Kirjavainen et al. suggested that the acquisition of two (or more) constructions (e.g., WANT-X and WANT-to) for verbs taking to-infinitival complement clauses can lead to infinitival to omissions, reflecting the relative frequencies of the constructions in the input. In the present study we analysed 13 English children's corpora to determine whether the presence of a variety of utterance types in the immediate discourse context preceding WANT-to-VP (e.g., I want to eat it) and erroneous *WANT-zero-VP (e.g., *I want - drink it) constructions was associated with infinitival to production/omission. This was done separately for the children's own and their interlocutors' discourse utterances. The data show that the occurrence of WANT-to and WANT-X constructions in the prior discourse was associated with differing proportions of infinitival to provision in the WANT-to/zero-VP construction. This together with Kirjavainen et al.'s (2009a) data suggests that children are learning at least two constructions for the verb WANT, that competition contributes to infinitival to omissions, and that the strength of competing representations is affected by overall input frequencies and the preceding discourse. © 2011 Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin/Boston.

Citation

Kirjavainen, M., & Theakston, A. (2011). Are infinitival to omission errors primed by prior discourse? The case of WANT constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 22(4), 629-657. https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2011.024

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jan 1, 2011
• Publication Date: Nov 1, 2011
• Journal: Cognitive Linguistics
• Print ISSN: 0936-5907
• Electronic ISSN: 1613-3641
• Publisher: De Gruyter
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 22
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 629-657
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2011.024
• Keywords: competition between constructions, corpus analysis, discourse, infinitival to, omission errors, priming, to-infinitive constructions
• Public URL: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/969603
• Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2011.024