Steve Fleetwood Steve.Fleetwood@uwe.ac.uk
Powers and tendencies re-visited
Fleetwood, Steve
Authors
Abstract
Whilst powers and tendencies are amongst the most fundamental concepts of critical realism, there are several problems with these concepts that have been ignored, avoided or glossed. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to tease out these problems and provide clarification and consistency where possible. The first part of the paper sketches the existing critical realist conceptualisation of tendencies by identifying eight distinct moments in a causal chain, denoted tendency1 to tendency8. Part two asks: Is there a difference between powers and tendencies? The answer, controversially perhaps, is: ‘No’. Part three asks: What is the difference between tendency1 and tendency2? The answer considers two possible arguments accounting for the difference, and initiates a re-think of some of the terminology used to discuss tendencies as distinct moments in a causal chain. The paper concludes by raising the possibility that tendencies or powers are not of an either/or, discrete, dichotomous or discontinuous nature, but are continuous. This raises the further possibility that powers or tendencies can come in stronger and weaker forms.
Citation
Fleetwood, S. (2011). Powers and tendencies re-visited. Journal of Critical Realism, 10(1), 80-99. https://doi.org/10.1558/jcr.v10i1.80
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 1, 2009 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2011 |
Deposit Date | Sep 21, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 29, 2024 |
Journal | Journal of Critical Realism |
Print ISSN | 1476-7430 |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 10 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 80-99 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1558/jcr.v10i1.80 |
Keywords | critical realism, ontology, powers, tendencies, laws |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/968222 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/jcr.v10i1.80 |
Additional Information | Additional Information : This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Critical Realism in 2011, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1558/jcr.v10i1.80 |
Files
JCR.Pows %26 Tends.final.pdf
(439 Kb)
PDF
JCR.Pows & Tends.final.doc
(195 Kb)
Document
You might also like
A definition of habit for socio-economics
(2021)
Journal Article
Re-visiting rules and norms
(2019)
Journal Article
Ontology and the Current Economic Crisis
(2017)
Book Chapter
Critical Essay: Meta-analysis: A critical realist critique and alternative
(2016)
Journal Article
The critical realist conception of open and closed systems
(2016)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search