L Brubaker
“Which are the best outcome measures when assessing treatments for lower urinary tract dysfunction?”
Brubaker, L; Cotterill, N
Authors
N Nikki Cotterill Nikki.Cotterill@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Long Term Conditions (Continence Care)
Abstract
A think tank was convened at the third ICI-RS meeting held in the UK, June 2011, to consider the best outcome measures when assessing treatments for lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD). Given the vast array of measures available a focus on questionnaires was decided upon, which continued to highlight a plethora of available tools. The decision was therefore taken to approach this topic from an alternative perspective and instead ask the audience of gathered experts in this field to consider, ‘‘What we need to ask as a minimum in order to capture the most fundamen- tal parameters when evaluating new treatments for LUTD?’’
Presentation Conference Type | Other |
---|---|
Conference Name | International Consultation on Incontinence - Research Society Annual Meeting 2011 |
Start Date | Jun 13, 2011 |
End Date | Jun 15, 2011 |
Acceptance Date | Jun 14, 2011 |
Peer Reviewed | Not Peer Reviewed |
Keywords | questionnaires, outcome measures, patient-centred assessment, lower urinary tract dysfunction |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/961599 |
Publisher URL | http://ici-rs.org/downloads/ICIRS2011-Scientific-Meeting-Programme.pdf |
Additional Information | Title of Conference or Conference Proceedings : International Consultation on Incontinence - Research Society Annual Meeting 2011 |
You might also like
Can a PRO be adequate without assessing quality of life?
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Using the ICIQ validated bladder diary and questionnaires in lower urinary tract dysfunction
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search