Selena Gray Selena.Gray@uwe.ac.uk
Professor
Selena Gray Selena.Gray@uwe.ac.uk
Professor
Laurence Carmichael Laurence.Carmichael@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer
Hugh Barton
Professor Julie Mytton Julie.Mytton@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Child Health
Helen Lease
Jennifer Joynt
Background: Spatial planning affects the built environment, which in turn has the potential to have a significant impact on health, for good or ill. One way of ensuring that spatial plans take due account of health is through the inclusion of health considerations in the statutory and non statutory appraisal processes linked to plan-making processes. Methods. A systematic review to identify evaluation studies of appraisals or assessments of plans where health issues were considered from 1987 to 2010. Results: A total of 6161 citations were identified: 6069 from electronic databases, 57 fromwebsite searches, with a further 35 citations from grey literature, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. These 20 citations reported on a total of 135 different case studies: 11 UK HIA; 11 non UK high income countries HIA, 5 UK SEA or other integrated appraisal; 108 non UK high income SEA or other integrated appraisal. All studies were in English. No relevant studies were identified reporting on low or middle income countries. The studies were limited by potential bias (no independent evaluation, with those undertaking the appraisal also responsible for reporting outcomes), lack of detail and a lack of triangulation of results. Health impact assessments generally covered the four specified health domains (physical activity, mental health and wellbeing, environmental health issues such as pollution and noise, injury) more comprehensively than SEA or other integrated appraisals, although mental health and wellbeing was an underdeveloped area. There was no evidence available on the incorporation of health in Sustainability Appraisal, limited evidence that the recommendations from any type of appraisal were implemented, and almost no evidence that the recommendations had led to the anticipated outcomes or improvements in health postulated. Conclusion: Research is needed to assess (i) the degree to which statutory plan appraisal processes (SA in the UK) incorporate health; (ii) whether recommendations arising from health appraisal translate into the development process and (iii) whether outcomes are as anticipated. © 2011 Gray.
Journal Article Type | Review |
---|---|
Publication Date | Nov 28, 2011 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 8, 2019 |
Journal | BMC Public Health |
Electronic ISSN | 1471-2458 |
Publisher | BioMed Central |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 11 |
Issue | 11 |
Pages | 889 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-889 |
Keywords | health, planning, impact assessment, plans, systematic review |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/958019 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-889 |
gray et al 2011 NICE.pdf
(250 Kb)
PDF
Predictive validity of recruitment into public health specialist training in the UK
(2014)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
A pilot study of a peer volunteering intervention for promoting active ageing in the community: Project ACE
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Improving hospital food: Evaluating the impact of the Soil Association Food for Life programme
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Improving hospital food: Evaluating the impact of the UK Food for Life Partnership
(2015)
Journal Article
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search