Lisa Claydon
Neuroscientific evidence in the English courts
Claydon, Lisa; Catley, Paul
Authors
Paul Catley
Contributors
Tade M Spranger
Editor
Henning Wagmann
Editor
Abstract
This chapter examines the use of neuroscientific evidence in the courts of England and Wales. It considers the breadth of uses which has been made of this evidence. In particular it examines the use of this evidence in cases where the capacity of the legal actor has been questioned. This may apply in evaluations of criminal responsibility and in a civil context in assessing capacity to perform legally meaningful actions such as the making of wills. Consideration is given to what this evidence adds to de-terminations of whether individuals are in a persistent vegetative state in particular in relation to the withdrawal of treatment. The chapter looks at the use of expert evidence in court and briefly considers proposed changes. Finally the chapter considers how neuroscientific evidence may be used in the future and also whether it has wider application in the criminal and civil justice systems.
Publication Date | Nov 30, 2011 |
---|---|
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Book Title | International Neurolaw a Comparative Analysis |
ISBN | 9783642215407 |
Keywords | neurolaw, neuroscience and law,crime, capacity to testate, compensation for injury, expert evidence |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/957417 |
Publisher URL | http://www.springer.com/law/book/978-3-642-21540-7 |
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search