Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The stability bias effect amongst lie-tellers: Testing the ‘miscalibration’ and ‘strategic’ hypotheses

Harvey, Adam; Vrij, Aldert; Hope, Lorraine; Mann, Samantha

The stability bias effect amongst lie-tellers: Testing the ‘miscalibration’ and ‘strategic’ hypotheses Thumbnail


Authors

Adam Harvey

Aldert Vrij

Lorraine Hope

Samantha Mann



Abstract

Unlike truth-tellers’ statements that show forgetting, lie-tellers’ statements appear less sensitive to delay. For lie-tellers, this failure to correctly simulate forgetting has been referred to as a stability bias. This experiment tests two explanations for this stability bias: the “miscalibration” hypothesis and the “strategic” hypothesis. Using a 2 (Task Type: Recall Estimate vs. Strategic Estimate) × 2 (Delay: Immediate vs. 3-week delay) design, participants (n = 142) either estimated how much detail a truth-teller might remember from an intelligence briefing (testing the miscalibration hypothesis), or how much detail was necessary to make a fabricated statement about the same intelligence briefing appear convincing to others (testing the strategic hypothesis). Before making these estimates, participants were informed that the briefing occurred immediately beforehand, or 3 weeks beforehand. Recall estimates correctly predicted forgetting would occur after a 3-week delay. Strategic estimates did not vary as a function of statement-time. No differences in subjective beliefs emerged. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

Citation

Harvey, A., Vrij, A., Hope, L., & Mann, S. (2022). The stability bias effect amongst lie-tellers: Testing the ‘miscalibration’ and ‘strategic’ hypotheses. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 11(3), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000019

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Dec 10, 2021
Online Publication Date Mar 11, 2022
Publication Date 2022-10
Deposit Date May 20, 2022
Publicly Available Date May 20, 2022
Journal Journal of Applied Research In Memory and Cognition (JARMAC)
Print ISSN 2211-3681
Electronic ISSN 2211-369X
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 11
Issue 3
Pages 437–444
DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000019
Keywords Deception; stability bias effect; forgetting; delay; metacognition.
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/9538717

Files

The stability bias effect amongst lie-tellers: Testing the ‘miscalibration’ and ‘strategic’ hypotheses (441 Kb)
PDF

Licence
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved

Publisher Licence URL
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved

Copyright Statement
(c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved

This is the author's accepted manuscript. It may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record. The final published version is available here: https://doi.org/10.1037/mac0000019.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations