Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Managing disagreement in problem solving meeting talk

Angouri, Jo

Authors

Jo Angouri



Abstract

Problem solving (PbS) talk has been associated with disagreement and conflict as interactants oppose each other's views and express diverse opinions. Although disagreement and conflict have been regarded in earlier work as potentially negative acts more recent work points to the importance of context and local practices instead of a priori categorizations of what the interactants perceive as un/acceptable linguistic behaviour. The paper draws on data from two projects on workplace discourse, one focusing on multinational companies situated in Europe and one on small/medium firms (SMEs). The dataset consists of recordings of meetings, ethnographic observations and interviews. The analysis of the data shows that 'deviating opinions' are not only 'acceptable' but also unmarked and they form an inherent part of the PbS process. At the same time linguistic behaviour perceived as face threatening or intentionally impolite is typically rare. The paper closes by drawing a theoretical distinction between marked and unmarked disagreement. The latter is perceived as task bound and does not pose a threat to the management of the meeting participants' complex identities and relationships. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.

Citation

Angouri, J. (2012). Managing disagreement in problem solving meeting talk. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1565-1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.010

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Sep 1, 2012
Journal Journal of Pragmatics
Print ISSN 0378-2166
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 44
Issue 12
Pages 1565-1579
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.010
Keywords disagreement ,meeting talk, multinationals, small-medium enterprises,
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/944256
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.06.010