Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The "quiet revolution" in criminal defence: How the zealous advocate slipped into the shadow

Smith, Tom

Authors

Profile Image

Tom Smith Thomas8.Smith@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Law



Abstract

The criminal defence lawyer has been an integral component of adversarial criminal justice in England and Wales for nearly three centuries. However, over the last two decades this essential role has changed substantially, affected by a changing culture in the law and procedure governing criminal justice in this jurisdiction. This article argues that the criminal defence role has been pulled away from its traditional adversarial roots through a process of subtle and gradual change, pursued by the Government and the Judiciary. The article outlines a normative framework, entitled the 'zealous advocate' model, describing the 'traditional' role of the criminal defence lawyer; discusses ethical conflict and its growing significance; and examines how legislation, case law and funding have gradually moved the defence lawyer away from a 'client-first' style of representation. It concludes by considering the potentially significant implications of such a change in the role for both fair trial rights and adversarialism in England and Wales. © 2013 © 2013 Taylor & Francis.

Citation

Smith, T. (2013). The "quiet revolution" in criminal defence: How the zealous advocate slipped into the shadow. International Journal of the Legal Profession, 20(1), 111-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2013.835906

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 1, 2013
Publication Date Mar 1, 2013
Journal International Journal of the Legal Profession
Print ISSN 0969-5958
Electronic ISSN 1469-9257
Publisher Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
Peer Reviewed Not Peer Reviewed
Volume 20
Issue 1
Pages 111-137
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2013.835906
Keywords criminal defence, zealous advocate, criminal justice, legal aid, criminal procedure
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/940369
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09695958.2013.835906