Ronald I. Dorn
The role of fieldwork in rock decay research: Case studies from the fringe
Dorn, Ronald I.; Gordon, Steven J.; Allen, Casey D.; Dixon, John C.; Groom, Kaelin M.; Paradise, Thomas R.; Dorn, Ronald I; Gordon, Steven J; Allen, Casey D; Dixon, John C; Groom, Kaelin M; Cerveny, Niccole; Paradise, Thomas R; Hall, Kevin; Harrison, Emma; Mol, Lisa; Sumner, Paul; Thompson, Tyler; Turkington, Alice V.
Authors
Steven J. Gordon
Casey D. Allen
John C. Dixon
Kaelin M. Groom
Thomas R. Paradise
Ronald I Dorn
Steven J Gordon
Casey D Allen
John C Dixon
Kaelin M Groom
Niccole Cerveny
Thomas R Paradise
Kevin Hall
Emma Harrison
Lisa Mol Lisa.Mol@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Geomorphology and Heritage in Conflict
Paul Sumner
Tyler Thompson
Alice V. Turkington
Abstract
Researchers exploring rock decay hail from chemistry, engineering, geography, geology, paleoclimatology, soil science, and other disciplines and use laboratory, microscopic, theoretical, and field-based strategies. We illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork forms the core knowledge of rock decay and continues to build on the classic research of Blackwelder, Bryan, Gilbert, Jutson, King, Linton, Twidale, and von Humboldt. While development of nonfield-based investigation has contributed substantially to our understanding of processes, the wide range of environments, stone types, and climatic variability encountered raises issues of temporal and spatial scales too complex to fit into attempts at universal modeling. Although nonfield methods are immensely useful for understanding overarching processes, they can miss subtle differences in factors that ultimately shape rock surfaces. We, therefore, illustrate here how the tradition of fieldwork continues today alongside laboratory and computer-based investigations and contributes to our understanding of rock decay processes. This includes the contribution of fieldwork to the learning process of undergraduates, the calculation of activation energies of plagioclase and olivine dissolution, the high Arctic, the discovery of a new global carbon sink, the influence of plant roots, an analysis of the need for protocols, tafoni development, stone monuments, and rock coatings. These compiled vignettes argue that, despite revolutionary advances in instrumentation, rock decay research must remain firmly footed in the field. © 2012 Elsevier B.V.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Dec 12, 2012 |
Publication Date | Oct 15, 2013 |
Deposit Date | Dec 14, 2016 |
Journal | Geomorphology |
Print ISSN | 0169-555X |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 200 |
Pages | 59-74 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 |
Keywords | chemical weathering, education, fieldwork, geomorphology, physical weathering, weathering |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/926872 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.012 |
Contract Date | Dec 14, 2016 |
You might also like
Measuring rock hardness in the field
(2014)
Book Chapter
Shot to pieces and shocked to the core
(2015)
Journal Article
Bullet impacts and built heritage damage 1640–1939
(2018)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search