Felix Ritchie Felix.Ritchie@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Economics
Measuring non-compliance with minimum wages
Ritchie, Felix; Veliziotis, Michail; Drew, Hilary; Whittard, Damian
Authors
Michail Veliziotis
Dr Hilary Lowe hilary.lowe@uwe.ac.uk
School Director (Partnerships & International)
Damian Whittard Damian2.Whittard@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Policy & Practice in Economics
Abstract
Many countries have a statutory minimum wage for employees. There is a strong policy interest in knowing the degree of compliance with the law. Quantitative analysis is ideally suited to this, and many countries have rich datasets for employment research. However, identifying genuine underpayment of wages is not straightforward: data quality, statistical factors and processing errors can all contribute to the under- or over-estimation of the true level of compliance. The impact is exacerbated by the binary ‘yes-no’ nature of compliance.
We consider the statistical measurement of non-compliance in the UK. UK minimum wages have been extensively studied, using large-scale high-quality datasets whose characteristics are well understood and whose overlapping coverage allows triangulation of results. We focus particularly on apprentices: a survey of apprentice wages was introduced in 2011, throwing further light on
measurement issues, even in a purpose-built survey instrument.
We identify several problems leading to under- and over-estimation of compliance rates. Some are well-known statistical or methodological issues, but others relate to the way that survey data is processed; this is rarely considered by data users. The binary nature of compliance makes such problems easier to identify and evaluate. In particular, we demonstrate the value of a very detailed knowledge of the data at crucial points in the distribution, and the importance of triangulation for understanding the reliability of estimates.
While concentrating on compliance with a statutory minimum wage, the paper has some wider lessons for the understanding the characteristics of large and complex datasets. We also show how the use of quantitative data can be used to effectively target complementary qualitative data
collection.
Working Paper Type | Working Paper |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Sep 15, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 15, 2016 |
Peer Reviewed | Not Peer Reviewed |
Keywords | minimum wage, non-compliance, measurement error, data quality |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/922740 |
Publisher URL | http://www1.uwe.ac.uk/bl/research/bristoleconomicanalysis/economicsworkingpapers/economicspapers2016.aspx |
Additional Information | Additional Information : Economics Working Paper Series 1608 |
Contract Date | Sep 15, 2016 |
Files
1608.pdf
(1.4 Mb)
PDF
You might also like
Operationalising ‘safe statistics’: The case of linear regression
(-0001)
Preprint / Working Paper
Addressing the human factor in data access: Incentive compatibility, legitimacy and cost-effectiveness in public data resources
(-0001)
Preprint / Working Paper
Resistance to change in government: Risk, inertia and incentives
(-0001)
Preprint / Working Paper
Access to sensitive data: Satisfying objectives rather than constraints
(2014)
Journal Article
Evidence-based, context-sensitive, user-centred, risk-managed SDC planning: Designing data access solutions for scientific use
(2015)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search