Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Feasibility study suggests no impact from protected engagement time on adverse events in mental health wards for older adults

Smith, Toby; Clark, Allan; Dodd, Emily; Khoo, Mary Ellen; Henker, Sarah; Cross, Jane; Cheston, Rik; Gray, Richard; Fox, Chris; Nolan, Fiona

Authors

Toby Smith

Allan Clark

Mary Ellen Khoo

Sarah Henker

Jane Cross

Richard Gray

Chris Fox

Fiona Nolan



Abstract

Hospital adverse events, such as falls, violence and aggression, security, self-harm, and suicide, are difficult to manage in older people with dementia. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether protected engagement time (PET) resulted in lower adverse events and incidents compared to comparable non-PET wards for people admitted to inpatient older people's mental health wards. Ten inpatient wards for older people were included. Five followed a PET-management pathway, while five continued usual care. All adverse events and incidents were recorded in routine hospital records over 72weeks. Data were gathered from these records and analysed as rate per person per week to assess differences in frequency and type of adverse events between wards. A total of 4130 adverse events were recorded. In the PET wards, a mean of 0.38 adverse events occurred per person per week compared to 0.40 in non-PET wards. No statistically-significant differences were found between PET and non-PET wards for adverse events (P=0.93), or for adverse events of any particular type (P≥0.15). Therefore, there is no evidence to suggest that PET has any impact on adverse events in older people's mental health wards. Further investigation with a larger cohort is warranted, using a definitive, phase 3, clinical trial.

Citation

Smith, T., Clark, A., Dodd, E., Khoo, M. E., Henker, S., Cross, J., …Nolan, F. (2018). Feasibility study suggests no impact from protected engagement time on adverse events in mental health wards for older adults. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27(2), 756-764. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12362

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 17, 2017
Online Publication Date Jul 6, 2017
Publication Date Apr 1, 2018
Deposit Date Jun 13, 2017
Publicly Available Date Jun 13, 2017
Journal International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
Print ISSN 1445-8330
Electronic ISSN 1447-0349
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 27
Issue 2
Pages 756-764
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12362
Keywords care model, dementia, older people mental health, nursing
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/900936
Additional Information This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Smith, T. , Clark, A. , Dodd, E. , Khoo, M. , Heneker, S. , Cross, J. , Cheston, R. , Gray, R. , Fox, C. and Nolan, F. (2018), Feasibility study suggests no impact from protected engagement time on adverse events in mental health wards for older adults. Int J Mental Health Nurs, 27: 756-764., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12362. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Files

CFPET vs Non-PET Title Page 20.04.2017 ACCEPTED 17.05.2017.pdf (497 Kb)
PDF

Licence
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved

Publisher Licence URL
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved

Copyright Statement
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Smith, T. , Clark, A. , Dodd, E. , Khoo, M. , Heneker, S. , Cross, J. , Cheston, R. , Gray, R. , Fox, C. and Nolan, F. (2018), Feasibility study suggests no impact from protected engagement time on adverse events in mental health wards for older adults. Int J Mental Health Nurs, 27: 756-764., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12362. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations