Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Mode of delivery affected questionnaire response rates in a birth cohort study

Bray, Isabelle; Bray, Issy; Noble, Sian; Robinson, Ross; Molloy, Lynn; Tilling, Kate

Mode of delivery affected questionnaire response rates in a birth cohort study Thumbnail


Authors

Isabelle Bray

Profile Image

Issy Bray Issy.Bray@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Public Health (Epidemiology)

Sian Noble

Ross Robinson

Lynn Molloy

Kate Tilling



Abstract

© 2016 The Author(s) Objectives Cohort studies must collect data from their participants as economically as possible, while maintaining response rates. This randomized controlled trial investigated whether offering a choice of online or paper questionnaires resulted in improved response rates compared with offering online first. Study Design and Setting Eligible participants were young people in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) study (born April 1, 1991, to December 31, 1992, in the Avon area). After exclusions, 8,795 participants were randomized. The “online first” group were invited to complete the questionnaire online. The “choice” group were also sent a paper questionnaire and offered a choice of completion method. The trial was embedded within routine data collection. The main outcome measure was the number of questionnaires returned. Data on costs were also collected. Results Those in the “online first” arm of the trial were less likely to return a questionnaire [adjusted odds ratio: 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82, 0.99]. The “choice” arm was more expensive (mean difference per participant £0.71; 95% CI: £0.65, £0.76). It cost an extra £47 to have one extra person to complete the questionnaire in the “choice” arm. Conclusion Offering a choice of completion methods (paper or online) for questionnaires in ALSPAC increased response rates but was more expensive than offering online first.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 9, 2016
Online Publication Date Sep 20, 2016
Publication Date Jan 1, 2017
Deposit Date Sep 15, 2016
Publicly Available Date Sep 20, 2016
Journal Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Print ISSN 0895-4356
Electronic ISSN 1878-5921
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 81
Pages 64-71
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.004
Keywords randomised controlled trial, online questionnaire, response rates, cohort study, ALSPAC, mixed mode
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/899270
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.004
Contract Date Sep 15, 2016

Files







You might also like



Downloadable Citations