Isabelle Bray
Mode of delivery affected questionnaire response rates in a birth cohort study
Bray, Isabelle; Bray, Issy; Noble, Sian; Robinson, Ross; Molloy, Lynn; Tilling, Kate
Authors
Issy Bray Issy.Bray@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Public Health (Epidemiology)
Sian Noble
Ross Robinson
Lynn Molloy
Kate Tilling
Abstract
© 2016 The Author(s) Objectives Cohort studies must collect data from their participants as economically as possible, while maintaining response rates. This randomized controlled trial investigated whether offering a choice of online or paper questionnaires resulted in improved response rates compared with offering online first. Study Design and Setting Eligible participants were young people in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) study (born April 1, 1991, to December 31, 1992, in the Avon area). After exclusions, 8,795 participants were randomized. The “online first” group were invited to complete the questionnaire online. The “choice” group were also sent a paper questionnaire and offered a choice of completion method. The trial was embedded within routine data collection. The main outcome measure was the number of questionnaires returned. Data on costs were also collected. Results Those in the “online first” arm of the trial were less likely to return a questionnaire [adjusted odds ratio: 0.90; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82, 0.99]. The “choice” arm was more expensive (mean difference per participant £0.71; 95% CI: £0.65, £0.76). It cost an extra £47 to have one extra person to complete the questionnaire in the “choice” arm. Conclusion Offering a choice of completion methods (paper or online) for questionnaires in ALSPAC increased response rates but was more expensive than offering online first.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 9, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 20, 2016 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2017 |
Deposit Date | Sep 15, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 20, 2016 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Print ISSN | 0895-4356 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 81 |
Pages | 64-71 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.004 |
Keywords | randomised controlled trial, online questionnaire, response rates, cohort study, ALSPAC, mixed mode |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/899270 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.09.004 |
Contract Date | Sep 15, 2016 |
Files
1-s2.0-S0895435616304401-main.pdf
(289 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Measuring the effectiveness of catch-up MMR delivered by school nurses compared to signposting to general practice on improving MMR coverage: A retrospective cohort study
(2018)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Proximity to overhead power lines and childhood leukaemia: an international pooled analysis
(2018)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search