Jo White Jo.White@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Research Fellow in Public Involvement
Reconcilable differences?: Portuguese obstetricians' and midwives' contrasting perspectives on childbirth, and women’s birthing experiences
White, Jo; Queiros, Filipa
Authors
Filipa Queiros
Abstract
Based on recent ethnographic research in Portugal, this paper examines contrasting perspectives of doctors and midwives regarding their roles in childbirth, the institutional contexts in which these divergent perspectives are enacted and sustained, and the inter-related experiences of birthing women. It was found that obstetricians’ rhetoric around birth focused on potential risk; interventions were often explicated through a perception of childbirth as a risk-laden, and potential emergency, situation. Within this discourse, hospital-based birth was presented as a triumph of progress. Technical measures were justified using institutional rationales, such as the use of anaesthetic pain relief during labour to ensure tranquillity within the maternity units and the induction of labour to guarantee “throughput” and free up hospital beds. Midwives, contrastingly, described their philosophy of care as one focused on offering women presence, guidance, and a range of informed choices in the management of birth, and professed their commitment to an ideal model of normal birth founded on minimal intervention, except in cases of clinical necessity. Both professional groups expressed mutual respect for each other´s skills and respective roles. However, the co-existence of different professional rationales within the same hospital setting, they admitted, resulted in tensions. These were found to be exacerbated by historical power dynamics and the present spatial and organisational separation of the two groups. Selected extracts from Portuguese women´s birth narratives from the same study are utilised to elucidate the variegated experiences of women, and the modes by which authoritative knowledge is reproduced. The potential ramifications of the current situation for the provision of effective maternity care are discussed, and the conceptualisation of women as autonomous consumers of services is challenged.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 25, 2018 |
Publication Date | Oct 1, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Jun 28, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 25, 2018 |
Journal | Etnografica |
Print ISSN | 0873-6561 |
Publisher | Centro em Rede de Investigação em Antropologia |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 22 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 643-668 |
Keywords | childbirth, doctors, midwives, maternity care, authoritative knowledge, Portugal, medicalization |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/859615 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.openedition.org/etnografica/6041 |
Contract Date | Jun 28, 2018 |
Files
etnografica-6041.pdf
(367 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Normal birth: Experiences from Portugal and beyond
(2014)
Report
Obstetric interventions in two groups of hospitals in Catalonia: A cross-sectional study
(2014)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search