Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Curbing unethical practices associated with preferential allocation of construction contracts in Ghana: Survey professionals’ perception of who should lead the way

Adinyira, Emmanuel; Manu, Patrick; Mahamadu, Abdul-Majeed; Olomolaiye, Paul; Agyekum, K

Curbing unethical practices associated with preferential allocation of construction contracts in Ghana: Survey professionals’ perception of who should lead the way Thumbnail


Authors

Emmanuel Adinyira

Patrick Manu Patrick.Manu@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Innovative Construction and Project Management

Abdul Mahamadu Abdul.Mahamadu@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Lecturer - CATE - AAE - UAAE0001

Paul Olomolaiye Paul.Olomolaiye@uwe.ac.uk
Pro Vice-Chancellor Equalities and Civic Engagement

K Agyekum



Abstract

The construction industry in Ghana is bursting with speculations and pieces of information that suggest that certain contracts are awarded on basis other than merits of a proposed bid and the competitiveness of cost. Undoubtedly, this unethical practice is amongst the most prominent challenges facing the construction industry in Ghana and many other developing countries. Literature is not lacking on measures to tackle this unethical practice, but what remains unclear is which professional stakeholder group is best positioned to lead efforts to change the situation. This paper reports a survey conducted into the extent to which key stakeholder groups of the Ghanaian built environment surveying profession (i.e. professionals; their organisations; and professional body) can influence improvement in unethical practices associated with preferential allocation of construction contracts in Ghana. On the four unethical practices considered, the results showed survey professionals perceived themselves to have greater influence in helping to curb the practice of collusion. On bribery, they perceived similar levels of influence as their organisations. The professional, his or her organisation and professional body were perceived to have similar influence in helping to curb discrimination and nepotisms whiles political influence was perceived to be best tackled by the professional’s organisation and the professional body. Results from this study provides information to begin a bigger conversation on how to curb unethical practices associated with the problem of preferential allocation of construction contracts in Ghana’s construction industry. Obviously, this conversation cannot be had without taking into consideration the roles various stakeholder groups can and should be playing in efforts to deal with the problem.

Citation

Adinyira, E., Manu, P., Mahamadu, A., Olomolaiye, P., & Agyekum, K. (2018). Curbing unethical practices associated with preferential allocation of construction contracts in Ghana: Survey professionals’ perception of who should lead the way.

Conference Name International Conference on Professionalism and Ethics in Construction
Conference Location London, England
Start Date Nov 21, 2018
End Date Nov 22, 2018
Acceptance Date Nov 12, 2018
Publication Date Nov 21, 2018
Deposit Date May 9, 2019
Publicly Available Date May 9, 2019
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
ISBN 9780956051424
Keywords preferential allocation, construction contracts, survey professionals, ethics, Ghana
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/856909
Additional Information Title of Conference or Conference Proceedings : International Conference on Professionalism and Ethics in Construction

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations