Danielle Guizzo
Why does the history of economic thought neglect post-Keynesian economics?
Guizzo, Danielle
Authors
Abstract
Despite receiving increased interest after the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 and consolidating itself as an established research program, Post-Keynesian economics remains under-represented within publications on the history of economics. When compared to other traditional heterodox approaches such as Marxist, Institutionalist, and Austrian economics, Post-Keynesian economics falls behind considerably, contradicting the Post-Keynesian appreciation for the history of the discipline. This article explores some reasons behind this detachment by considering two main factors: first, the recent disciplinary and institutional changes experienced by the history of economics in the last ten years; and, second, the recent ‘maturing state’ of Post-Keynesian economics and its unique treatment of the history of economic thought. The article concludes by suggesting a new research agenda for Post-Keynesianism, making use of the ‘applied’ turn proposed by the recent history of economic thought as one of the strategies for Post-Keynesians to engage with the economics discipline.
Citation
Guizzo, D. (2020). Why does the history of economic thought neglect post-Keynesian economics?. Review of Keynesian Economics, 8(1), 119-137. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 21, 2019 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 1, 2020 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Jan 23, 2019 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 2, 2021 |
Journal | Review of Keynesian Economics |
Print ISSN | 2049-5323 |
Electronic ISSN | 2049-5331 |
Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 8 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 119-137 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09 |
Keywords | Post-Keynesian economics, history of economic thought, history of recent economics, postwar macroeconomics, traditional heterodoxy, new heterodoxy |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/853582 |
Publisher URL | https://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/roke/roke-overview.xml |
Files
HET and Post-Keynesian_ROKE 2018 final version.docx
(84 Kb)
Document
Licence
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Copyright Statement
This is the accepted version of the article. The final published version can be found online at: https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09
HET and Post-Keynesian_ROKE 2018 final version (1).pdf
(635 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Copyright Statement
This is the accepted version of the article. The final published version can be found online at: https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09
You might also like
Keynes, Foucault and the 'disciplinary complex': A contribution to the analysis of work
(2018)
Journal Article
Ethical transformation and government of the self in Keynes’s economic system
(2017)
Journal Article