Testing the effectiveness of surveying techniques in determining bat community composition within woodland

Park, Kirsty J.; Lintott, Paul; Fuentes-Montemayor, Elisa; Goulson, Dave

Abstract

Context Determining the biodiversity of an area is essential for making targeted conservation decisions. Undertaking surveys to confirm species presence or to estimate population sizes can be difficult, particularly for elusive species. Bats are able to detect and avoid traps, making it difficult to quantify abundance. Although acoustic surveys using bat detectors are often used as a surrogate for relative abundance, the implicit assumption that there is a positive correlation between activity levels and abundance is rarely tested. Aims We assessed the effectiveness of surveying techniques (i.e. Trapping and acoustic monitoring) for detecting species presence and tested the strength of collinearity among methods. In addition, we tested whether the use of an acoustic lure (a bat-call synthesiser) increased bat-capture rate and therefore species detectability. Methods Surveying was carried out over 3 years in central Scotland (UK), in 68 woodlands within predominantly agricultural or urban landscapes. Key results There was a significant positive relationship between bat activity recorded on ultrasonic detectors and the relative abundance of Pipistrellus pygmaeus and P. pipistrellus, but not those in the genus Myotis. In general, acoustic monitoring was more effective than trapping at determining species presence; however, to ensure rarer or quiet species are recorded, a complementary approach is required. Broadcasting four different types of echolocation call resulted in a 2-12-fold increase in trapping success across four species of insectivorous bat found in the study region. Whereas lure effectiveness remained unchanged for female P. pygmaeus over time, there was a marked increase in the number of males captured using the lure throughout the summer (May to September). Conclusions In the present study, we have demonstrated a variety of ways to increase surveying efficiency, which can maximise the knowledge of diversity in an area, minimise wildlife disturbance, and enhance surveying effectiveness. Implications Increasing surveying efficiency can improve the accuracy of targeted conservation decisions. Journal compilation © CSIRO 2013.

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Feb 4, 2014
• Online Publication Date: Mar 11, 2014
• Publication Date: Mar 11, 2014
• Deposit Date: Nov 10, 2017
• Journal: Wildlife Research
• Print ISSN: 1035-3712
• Electronic ISSN: 1448-5494
• Publisher: CSIRO Publishing
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 40
• Issue: 8
• Pages: 675-684
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/WR13153
• Keywords: acoustic lure, acoustic survey, capture methods, microchiroptera, surveying efficiency, trapping
• Public URL: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/820326
• Publisher URL: https://doi.org/10.1071/WR13153
• Contract Date: Nov 10, 2017