Skip to main content

Research Repository

See what's under the surface

Validation of the educational needs assessment tool as a generic instrument for rheumatic diseases in seven European countries

Zangi, Heidi A.; Stamm, Tanja A.; Vliet Vlieland, Theodora P.M.; Ndosi, Mwidimi; Bremander, Ann; Hamnes, Bente; Horton, Mike; Kukkurainen, Marja Leena; Machado, Pedro; Stamm, Tanja A; Marques, Andrea; Meesters, Jorit; Vliet Vlieland, Theodora P M; Tennant, Alan; Zangi, Heidi A; De La Torre-Aboki, Jenny; Hill, Jackie

Authors

Heidi A. Zangi

Tanja A. Stamm

Theodora P.M. Vliet Vlieland

Ann Bremander

Bente Hamnes

Mike Horton

Marja Leena Kukkurainen

Pedro Machado

Tanja A Stamm

Andrea Marques

Jorit Meesters

Theodora P M Vliet Vlieland

Alan Tennant

Heidi A Zangi

Jenny De La Torre-Aboki

Jackie Hill



Abstract

© 2014, BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved. Objectives: To validate the educational needs assessment tool (ENAT) as a generic tool for assessing the educational needs of patients with rheumatic diseases in European Countries. Methods: A convenience sample of patients from seven European countries was included comprising the following diagnostic groups: ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, osteoarthritis (OA) and fibromyalgia syndrome. Translated versions of the ENAT were completed through surveys in each country. Rasch analysis was used to assess the construct validity of the adapted ENATs including differential item functioning by culture (cross-cultural DIF). Initially, the data from each country and diagnostic group were fitted to the Rasch model separately, and then the pooled data from each diagnostic group. Results: The sample comprised 3015 patients; the majority, 1996 (66.2%), were women. Patient characteristics (stratified by diagnostic group) were comparable across countries except the educational background, which was variable. In most occasions, the 39-item ENAT deviated significantly from the Rasch model expectations (item-trait interaction ×2 p0.18) in all pooled disease group datasets except OA (×2=99.91; p=0.002). The internal consistency in each group was high (Person Separation Index above 0.90). There was no significant DIF by person characteristics. Cross-cultural DIF was found in some items, which required adjustments. Subsequently, interval-level scales were calibrated to enable transformation of ENAT scores when required. Conclusions: The adapted ENAT is a valid tool with high internal consistency providing accurate estimation of the educational needs of people with rheumatic diseases. Cross-cultural comparison of educational needs is now possible.

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Dec 1, 2014
Journal Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Print ISSN 0003-4967
Electronic ISSN 1468-2060
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 73
Issue 12
Pages 2122-2129
APA6 Citation Zangi, H. A., Vliet Vlieland, T. P., Stamm, T. A., Ndosi, M., Bremander, A., Hamnes, B., …Hill, J. (2014). Validation of the educational needs assessment tool as a generic instrument for rheumatic diseases in seven European countries. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 73(12), 2122-2129. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203461
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203461
Keywords validation, educational needs assessment tool, generic instrument, rheumatic diseases, European countries
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203461
Related Public URLs http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203461

Files







You might also like



Downloadable Citations