Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Potential impacts of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments in England: Initial qualitative findings from a national mixed-methods evaluation

Scantlebury, Arabella; Brant, Heather; Anderson, Helen; Leggett, Heather; Salisbury, Chris; Cowlishaw, Sean; Voss, Sarah; Benger, Jonathan Richard; Adamson, Joy

Potential impacts of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments in England: Initial qualitative findings from a national mixed-methods evaluation Thumbnail


Authors

Arabella Scantlebury

Heather Brant

Helen Anderson

Heather Leggett

Chris Salisbury

Sean Cowlishaw

Sarah Voss Sarah.Voss@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Emergency and Critical Care

Jonathan Richard Benger

Joy Adamson



Abstract

Objectives To explore the potential impacts of introducing General Practitioners into Emergency Departments (GPED) from the perspectives of service leaders, health professionals and patients. These 'expectations of impact' can be used to generate hypotheses that will inform future implementations and evaluations of GPED. Design Qualitative study consisting of 228 semistructured interviews. Setting 10 acute National Health Service (NHS) hospitals and the wider healthcare system in England. Interviews were undertaken face to face or via telephone. Data were analysed thematically. Participants 124 health professionals and 94 patients and carers. 10 service leaders representing a range of national organisations and government departments across England (eg, NHS England and Department of Health) were also interviewed. Results A range of GPED models are being implemented across the NHS due to different interpretations of national policy and variation in local context. This has resulted in stakeholders and organisations interpreting the aims of GPED differently and anticipating a range of potential impacts. Participants expected GPED to affect the following areas: ED performance indicators; patient outcome and experience; service access; staffing and workforce experience; and resources. Across these 'domains of influence', arguments for positive, negative and no effect of GPED were proposed. Conclusions Evaluating whether GPED has been successful will be challenging. However, despite uncertainty surrounding the direction of effect, there was agreement across all stakeholder groups on the areas that GPED would influence. As a result, we propose eight domains of influence that will inform our subsequent mixed-methods evaluation of GPED.

Citation

Scantlebury, A., Brant, H., Anderson, H., Leggett, H., Salisbury, C., Cowlishaw, S., …Adamson, J. (2021). Potential impacts of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments in England: Initial qualitative findings from a national mixed-methods evaluation. BMJ Open, 11(5), Article e045453. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045453

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 15, 2021
Online Publication Date May 24, 2021
Publication Date May 24, 2021
Deposit Date Jun 9, 2021
Publicly Available Date Sep 30, 2021
Journal BMJ Open
Electronic ISSN 2044-6055
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 11
Issue 5
Article Number e045453
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045453
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/7456547

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations