Arabella Scantlebury
Potential impacts of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments in England: Initial qualitative findings from a national mixed-methods evaluation
Scantlebury, Arabella; Brant, Heather; Anderson, Helen; Leggett, Heather; Salisbury, Chris; Cowlishaw, Sean; Voss, Sarah; Benger, Jonathan Richard; Adamson, Joy
Authors
Heather Brant
Helen Anderson
Heather Leggett
Chris Salisbury
Sean Cowlishaw
Sarah Voss Sarah.Voss@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Emergency and Critical Care
Jonathan Richard Benger
Joy Adamson
Abstract
Objectives To explore the potential impacts of introducing General Practitioners into Emergency Departments (GPED) from the perspectives of service leaders, health professionals and patients. These 'expectations of impact' can be used to generate hypotheses that will inform future implementations and evaluations of GPED. Design Qualitative study consisting of 228 semistructured interviews. Setting 10 acute National Health Service (NHS) hospitals and the wider healthcare system in England. Interviews were undertaken face to face or via telephone. Data were analysed thematically. Participants 124 health professionals and 94 patients and carers. 10 service leaders representing a range of national organisations and government departments across England (eg, NHS England and Department of Health) were also interviewed. Results A range of GPED models are being implemented across the NHS due to different interpretations of national policy and variation in local context. This has resulted in stakeholders and organisations interpreting the aims of GPED differently and anticipating a range of potential impacts. Participants expected GPED to affect the following areas: ED performance indicators; patient outcome and experience; service access; staffing and workforce experience; and resources. Across these 'domains of influence', arguments for positive, negative and no effect of GPED were proposed. Conclusions Evaluating whether GPED has been successful will be challenging. However, despite uncertainty surrounding the direction of effect, there was agreement across all stakeholder groups on the areas that GPED would influence. As a result, we propose eight domains of influence that will inform our subsequent mixed-methods evaluation of GPED.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 15, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | May 24, 2021 |
Publication Date | May 24, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Jun 9, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Sep 30, 2021 |
Journal | BMJ Open |
Electronic ISSN | 2044-6055 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 11 |
Issue | 5 |
Article Number | e045453 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045453 |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/7456547 |
Files
Potential impacts of general practitioners working in or alongside emergency departments in England: Initial qualitative findings from a national mixed-methods evaluation
(438 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search