Adam Charles Harvey
Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality
Harvey, Adam Charles; Vrij, Aldert; Leal, Sharon; Deeb, Haneen; Hope, Lorraine; Mann, Samantha
Authors
Aldert Vrij
Sharon Leal
Haneen Deeb
Lorraine Hope
Samantha Mann
Abstract
Typically, truth-tellers report more detailed statements when interviewed immediately, compared to after delays (displaying forgetting), whereas liars report statements containing similar amounts of detail when interviewed immediately or after a delay (displaying a metacognitive error). Accordingly, the diagnostic utility of the ‘richness-of-detail’ cue is reduced after delays. We investigated if initial interviewing can facilitate lie-detection using the richness-of-detail cue in sub-optimal memorial conditions, that is, when (i) interviewing occurred after a three-week delay and (ii) truth-teller's attention during encoding was manipulated. Participants (n = 152) witnessed an interaction, that was meaningful to (and intentionally encoded by) liars (n = 50) and half of truth-tellers (n = 51), but meaningless (and incidentally encoded by) the remaining truth-tellers (n = 51). Participants were interviewed after three weeks. Half of the intentional liars and half of the intentional and incidental truth-tellers were also interviewed immediately (initial interview-present condition), whereas the remaining participants received no immediate interview (initial interview-absent condition). Results showed intentional and incidental truth-tellers reported after three weeks more detail in the initial interview-present (versus absent) condition, whereas intentional liars' statements were unaffected by initial interviewing condition. After three weeks, more intentional liars and intentional truth-tellers were correctly distinguished in the initial interview-present (versus absent) condition.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jun 30, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jul 16, 2020 |
Publication Date | Sep 1, 2020 |
Deposit Date | Mar 12, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 17, 2022 |
Journal | Acta Psychologica |
Print ISSN | 0001-6918 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 209 |
Article Number | 103130 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103130 |
Keywords | Initial interviewing, Memory, Forgetting, Encoding |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/7197836 |
Files
Amplifying Recall After Delays Via Initial Interviewing
(567 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Copyright Statement
This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final published version is available here: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103130
You might also like
Extending the verifiability approach framework: The effect of initial questioning
(2018)
Journal Article
Deception and decay: Verbal lie detection as a function of delay and encoding quality
(2017)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search