Gail Kenning
Evaluation or ‘anecdote’? Understanding the impact of design
Kenning, Gail; Treadaway, Cathy; Fennell, Jac; Prytherch, David
Authors
Cathy Treadaway
Dr Jac Fennell Jac.Fennell@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Product Design
David Prytherch
Abstract
Designers are increasingly engaging in participatory co-design approaches to understand the needs and wants of the people who will engage with the artefacts produced. These approaches are particularly relevant for design that focuses on social change, work undertaken with vulnerable groups who may not be articulate, and for designers working across disciplines, engaging with, for example, health related issues. While these projects may have clear goals in terms of outputs, often outcomes are not as clearly defined. So, how do we measure, evaluate and understand what has taken place, and reflect and report the findings? This paper reports on a UK-funded research project designing for people living with advanced dementia using mixed methodology research and evaluation. It explores issues around how designers self-evaluate and report on outputs and outcomes, and how robust evaluation can be undertaken throughout projects that use design research and thinking, or action research approaches. While, informal feedback in design projects can sometimes be dismissed as ‘anecdotal’, it suggests that unsolicited responses provide rich and valuable data to inform the overall evaluation and findings of a project. While designers may resist evaluation, feel that evaluation is imposed on them, or are not sure how to evaluate their projects, this paper suggests that by evaluating appropriately they can produce evidence to show the value and importance of their work.
Presentation Conference Type | Conference Paper (published) |
---|---|
Conference Name | Design4Health 2018 |
Acceptance Date | Mar 1, 2018 |
Publication Date | Mar 9, 2018 |
Deposit Date | Mar 4, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Mar 11, 2021 |
Pages | 277-282 |
Book Title | Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Design4Health |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/7174970 |
Publisher URL | https://research.shu.ac.uk/design4health/publications/2018-conference-proceedings |
Additional Information | Kenning, G., Treadaway, C., Fennell, J., Prytherch, D., (2018) 'Evaluation or ‘anecdote’? Understanding the impact of design', in: Christer, K., Craig, C., Wolstenholme, D. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Design4Health. Sheffield 4th – 6th September 2018 |
Files
Evaluation or ‘anecdote’? Understanding the impact of design
(179 Kb)
PDF
Licence
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Publisher Licence URL
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved
Copyright Statement
The published conference proceedings are available here: https://research.shu.ac.uk/design4health/publications/2018-conference-proceedings
You might also like
HUG: A compassionate approach to designing for wellbeing in dementia care
(2023)
Journal Article
Making HUGs: Crafting well-being benefits through social manufacturing
(2020)
Journal Article
Making space for uncertainty
(2020)
Book Chapter
Laugh empowered PSCI evaluation and making: Playful objects for wellbeing, emotional regulation and engagement for dementia and post stroke cognitive impairment
(2019)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
The Lancaster care charter
(2019)
Journal Article