Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

The just world hypothesis as an argumentative resource in debates about unemployment benefits

Goodman, Simon; Carr, Philippa

Authors

Simon Goodman

Philippa Carr



Abstract

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The concept of the “just world” is established as a key explanation for how people make sense of inequality so that those deemed to score high in belief in a just world are more likely to hold prejudicial beliefs and to blame people in poverty for their situations. However, this is an inadequate explanation for such complicated and controversial issues. To better understand talk about the just world and the controversial issue of the distribution of unemployment benefits (an issue of inequality), a discursive psychological approach to the just world is used. Therefore, a discourse analysis focusses on 2 feature length British televised discussions about benefit claimants called “The Big Benefit Row: Live” (Channel 5 3/2/2014) and “Benefits Britain: the Debate” (Channel 4 17/2/2014). The analysis demonstrates that people draw on both just and unjust world arguments simultaneously and also topicalise what counts as just so as to support their positions on unemployment benefits, rather than in the consistent way that just world theory would predict. It is therefore argued that the just world should be recast as a cultural value that facilitates arguments about benefits, rather than an internally held belief.

Citation

Goodman, S., & Carr, P. (2017). The just world hypothesis as an argumentative resource in debates about unemployment benefits. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27(4), 312-323. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2314

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Apr 7, 2017
Online Publication Date May 30, 2017
Publication Date Jul 6, 2017
Deposit Date Oct 1, 2020
Journal Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology
Print ISSN 1052-9284
Electronic ISSN 1099-1298
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 27
Issue 4
Pages 312-323
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2314
Keywords Sociology and Political Science; Social Psychology
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/6658713
Related Public URLs https://pureportal.coventry.ac.uk/en/publications/the-just-world-hypothesis-as-an-argumentative-resource-in-debates