Elena Milani Elena.Milani@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Lecturer - HAS Applied Sciences - UDAS0001
The visual vaccine debate on Twitter: A social network analysis
Milani, Elena; Weitkamp, Emma; Webb, Peter
Authors
Emma Weitkamp Emma.Weitkamp@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Science Communication
Peter Webb Peter.Webb@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Soc & Crim
Abstract
Pro- and anti-vaccination users use social media outlets, such as Twitter, to join conversations about vaccines, disseminate information or misinformation about immunization, and advocate in favour or against vaccinations. These users not only share textual content, but also images to emphasise their messages and influence their audiences. Though previous studies investigated the content of vaccine images, there is little research on how these visuals are distributed in digital environments. Therefore, this study explored how images related to vaccination are shared on Twitter to gain insight into the communities and networks formed around their dissemination. Moreover, this research also investigated who influences the distribution of vaccine images, and could be potential gatekeepers of vaccination information. We conducted a social network analysis on samples of tweets with images collected in June, September and October 2016. In each dataset, pro- and anti-vaccination users formed two polarised networks that hardly interacted with each other, and disseminated images among their members differently. The anti-vaccination users frequently retweeted each other, strengthening their relationships, making the information redundant within their community, and confirming their beliefs against immunisation. The pro-vaccine users, instead, formed a fragmented network, with loose but strategic connections that facilitated networking and the distribution of new vaccine information. Moreover, while the pro-vaccine gatekeepers were non-governmental organisations or health professionals, the anti-vaccine ones were activists and/or parents. Activists and parents could potentially be considered as alternative but trustworthy sources of information enabling them to disseminate misinformation about vaccinations.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 18, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 25, 2020 |
Publication Date | Jun 25, 2020 |
Deposit Date | May 5, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Jul 16, 2020 |
Journal | Media and Communication |
Electronic ISSN | 2183-2439 |
Publisher | Cogitatio Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 8 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 364-375 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2847 |
Keywords | activism, expertise, social media, social network analysis, Twitter, vaccines |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/5956303 |
Files
The visual vaccine debate on Twitter
(2.2 Mb)
PDF
Licence
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
You might also like
Crass, subculture and class: The milieu culture of DIY punk
(2014)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search