Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Biotic and abiotic drivers of ecosystem functioning differ between a temperate and a tropical region

van Dijk, Laura J. A.; Miraldo, Andreia; Raharinjanahary, Dimby; Rajoelison, Eric Tsiriniaina; Fisher, Brian L.; Goodsell, Robert M.; Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht, Elzbieta; Åhlén, David; Högvall, Johanna; Lundberg, Erika; Rova, Emma; Łukasik, Piotr; Ronquist, Fredrik; Roslin, Tomas; Tack, Ayco J. M.

Biotic and abiotic drivers of ecosystem functioning differ between a temperate and a tropical region Thumbnail


Authors

Laura J. A. van Dijk

Andreia Miraldo

Dimby Raharinjanahary

Eric Tsiriniaina Rajoelison

Brian L. Fisher

Robert M. Goodsell

Elzbieta Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht

David Åhlén

Johanna Högvall

Erika Lundberg

Emma Rova

Piotr Łukasik

Fredrik Ronquist

Tomas Roslin

Ayco J. M. Tack



Abstract

Any single ecosystem will provide many ecosystem functions. Whether these functions tend to increase in concert or trade off against each other is a question of much current interest. Equally topical are the drivers behind ecosystem function rates. Yet, we lack large-scale systematic studies that investigate how abiotic factors can directly or indirectly — via effects on biodiversity — drive ecosystem functioning. In this study, we assessed the impact of climate, landscape and biotic community on ecosystem functioning and multifunctioning in the temperate and tropical zone, and investigated potential trade-offs among ecosystem functions in both zones. To achieve this, we measured a diverse set of insect-related ecosystem functions — including herbivory, seed dispersal, predation, decomposition and pollination — at 50 sites across Madagascar and 171 sites across Sweden, and characterized the insect community at each site using Malaise traps. We used structural equations models to infer causality of the effects of climate, landscape, and biodiversity on ecosystem functioning. For the temperate zone, we found that abiotic factors were more important than biotic factors in driving ecosystem functioning, while in the tropical zone, effects of biotic drivers were most pronounced. In terms of trade-offs among functions, in the temperate zone, only seed dispersal and predation were positively correlated, while all other functions were uncorrelated. By contrast, in the tropical zone, most ecosystem functions increased in concert, highlighting that tropical ecosystems can simultaneously provide a diverse set of functions. These correlated functions in Madagascar could for the most part be explained by similar responses to local climate, landscape, and biota. Our study suggests that the functioning of temperate and tropical ecosystems differs fundamentally in patterns and drivers. Without a better understanding of these differences, it will be impossible to correctly predict shifts in ecosystem functioning in response to environmental disturbances. To identify global patterns and drivers of ecosystem functioning, we will next need replicate sampling across biomes – as here achieved for two regions, thus paving the road and setting the baseline expectations.

Working Paper Type Preprint
Deposit Date Jul 18, 2025
Publicly Available Date Jul 18, 2025
DOI https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.28.582312
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/14703190

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations