Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among sub-Saharan Africans (SSA): A comparative study of residents and diasporan dwellers

Miner, Chundung Asabe; Timothy, Chikasirimobi G.; Percy, Khathutshelo; Mashige; Osuagwu, Uchechukwu Levi; Envuladu, Esther Awazzi; Amiebenomo, Onyekachukwu Mary-Anne; Ovenseri-Ogbomo, Godwin; Charwe, Deborah Donald; Goson, Piwuna Christopher; Ekpenyong, Bernadine N.; Abu, Emmanuel Kwasi; Langsi, Raymond; Oloruntoba, Richard; Ishaya, Tanko; Agho, Kingsley E.

Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine among sub-Saharan Africans (SSA): A comparative study of residents and diasporan dwellers Thumbnail


Authors

Chundung Asabe Miner

Chikasirimobi G. Timothy

Khathutshelo Percy

Mashige

Uchechukwu Levi Osuagwu

Esther Awazzi Envuladu

Onyekachukwu Mary-Anne Amiebenomo

Godwin Ovenseri-Ogbomo

Deborah Donald Charwe

Piwuna Christopher Goson

Bernadine N. Ekpenyong

Emmanuel Kwasi Abu

Raymond Langsi

Richard Oloruntoba

Tanko Ishaya

Kingsley E. Agho



Abstract

Background
The COVID-19 vaccines are being rolled out across all the sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries, with countries setting targets for achieving full vaccination rates. The aim of this study was to compare the uptake of, resistance and hesitancy to the COVID-19 vaccine between SSA locally residents and in the diasporan dwellers.

Methods
This was a cross-sectional study conducted using a web and paper-based questionnaire to obtain relevant information on COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. The survey items included questions on demography, uptake and planned acceptance or non-acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccines among SSAs. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine probabilities of outcomes for factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination resistance and hesitancy among SSA respondents residing within and outside Africa.

Results
Uptake of COVID-19 vaccines varied among the local (14.2%) and diasporan (25.3%) dwellers. There were more locals (68.1%) who were resistant to COVID-19 vaccine. Participants’ sex [adjusted relative risk (ARR) = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58 – 0.93], education [primary/less: ARR = 0.22, CI:0.12 – 0.40, and bachelor’s degree: ARR = 0.58, CI: 0.43 – 0.77]), occupation [ARR = 0.32, CI: 0.25—0.40] and working status [ARR = 1.40, CI: 1.06—1.84] were associated with COVID-19 vaccine resistance among locals. Similar proportion of local and diasporan dwellers (~ 18% each) were hesitant to COVID-19 vaccine, and this was higher among health care workers [ARR = 0.25, CI: 0.10 – 0.62 and ARR = 0.24, CI:0.18—0.32, diaspora and locals respectively]. After adjusting for the potential confounders, local residents aged 29–38 years [ARR = 1.89, CI: 1.26—2.84] and lived in East Africa [ARR = 4.64, CI: 1.84—11.70] were more likely to report vaccine hesitancy. Knowledge of COVID vaccines was associated with hesitancy among local and diasporan dwellers, but perception was associated with vaccine resistance [ARR = 0.86,CI: 0.82 – 0.90] and hesitancy [ARR = 0.85, CI: 0.80 – 0.90], only among the local residents.

Conclusions
Differences exist in the factors that influence COVID-19 vaccine acceptance between local SSA residents and thediasporan dwellers. Knowledge about COVID-19 vaccines affects the uptake, resistance, and hesitancy to the COVID-19 vaccine. Information campaigns focusing on the efficacy and safety of vaccines could lead to improved acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jan 23, 2023
Online Publication Date Jan 28, 2023
Publication Date Jan 28, 2023
Deposit Date Aug 12, 2024
Publicly Available Date Aug 12, 2024
Journal BMC Public Health
Electronic ISSN 1471-2458
Publisher BioMed Central
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 23
Article Number 191
DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15116-w
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/12781185

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations