'A proud history of protecting refugees': Ambivalent responses to refugee integration in government policy documents

Parker, Samuel

'A proud history of protecting refugees': Ambivalent responses to refugee integration in government policy documents

Parker, Samuel

Authors

Samuel Parker

Abstract

In recent years asylum seekers arriving in the United Kingdom have been subject to a 'hostile policy environment' (Zetter et al. 2005) initiated by the UK government consisting of dispersal, destitution and detention. At the same time, the UK government has also focussed on 'integrating' refugees. In this paper, Critical Discourse Analysis of seven policy documents is used to demonstrate how ambivalence is a feature of UK and devolved government refugee integration strategies. Analysis revealed that each strategy is predicated upon rhetorical devices which construct the governments as having a 'proud history' of offering protection to those fleeing persecution by drawing on long histories and traditions of welcoming refugees. Such rhetorical and commemorative devices may also function to dialogically repress (Billig 1997) the UK's history of not providing protection to refugees and of creating a 'hostile environment' for asylum seekers. It concludes that such devices construct refugee integration ambivalently, which is a result of an ideological dilemma (Billig et al. 1988) inherent in these strategies between the integration of refugees and deterrence of asylum seekers.

Citation

Parker, S. (2019). 'A proud history of protecting refugees': Ambivalent responses to refugee integration in government policy documents. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 11(1), 20-40

Journal Article Type	Article
Acceptance Date	Jul 26, 2019
Online Publication Date	Aug 21, 2019
Publication Date	Aug 21, 2019
Deposit Date	Dec 8, 2023
Publicly Available Date	Dec 12, 2023
Journal	CADAAD Journal
Peer Reviewed	Peer Reviewed
Volume	11
Issue	1
Pages	20-40
Keywords	Integration; refugees; asylum seekers; critical discourse analysis; ambivalence
Public URL	https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/11491780
Publisher URL	https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/journals/cadaad/volume-11-1-2019/

Files

'A proud history of protecting refugees': Ambivalent responses to refugee integration in government policy documents (286 Kb)
PDF

Licence
http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved

Copyright Statement
Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines is an Open Access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the DOAJ definition of Open Access.