Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Joint estimation of Down syndrome risk and ascertainment rates: A meta-analysis of nine published data sets

Bray, Isabelle; Wright, David E.; Davies, Chris; Hook, Ernest B.

Authors

Profile Image

Issy Bray Issy.Bray@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Public Health (Epidemiology)

David E. Wright

Chris Davies

Ernest B. Hook



Abstract

In this paper we present an analysis of nine data sets in which ascertainment and maternal age risk of Down syndrome are estimated jointly using maximum likelihood. We include data on 4825 Down syndrome cases from nine previously published data sets. These include data from studies carried out before the introduction of prenatal screening and from recent studies involving women who had not received prenatal testing. Our results show that, allowing for under-ascertainment, there is a good degree of consistency between the different data sets. We compare the three- and five-parameter constant plus exponential model with a three-parameter logistic model for maternal age-specific risk. We show that the three-parameter logistic model provides a good fit to the data and compare rates from this model with those derived from published studies of uncertain completeness and those from data sets believed to be complete. In general, our results agree closely with those of the latter, but achieve greater precision because of the inclusion of additional data. Our derived rates are considerably higher than those of Cuckle et al., which are embedded in many computer systems for generating risks.

Citation

Bray, I., Wright, D. E., Davies, C., & Hook, E. B. (1998). Joint estimation of Down syndrome risk and ascertainment rates: A meta-analysis of nine published data sets. Prenatal Diagnosis, 18(1), 9-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0223%28199801%2918%3A1%3C9%3A%3AAID-PD210%3E3.0.CO%3B2-F

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Jan 1, 1998
Journal Prenatal Diagnosis
Print ISSN 0197-3851
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 18
Issue 1
Pages 9-20
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-0223%28199801%2918%3A1%3C9%3A%3AAID-PD210%3E3.0.CO%3B2-F
Keywords Down syndrome, prenatal diagnosis, ascertainment, logistic model
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/1100172
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199801)18:13.0.CO;2-F