Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Demolition or retention of buildings: Drivers at the masterplan scale

Baker, Hannah; Moncaster, Alice; Wilkinson, Sara; Remøy, Hilde

Demolition or retention of buildings: Drivers at the masterplan scale Thumbnail


Authors

Hannah Baker

Alice Moncaster

Sara Wilkinson

Hilde Remøy



Abstract

Current adaptation theory tends to consider individual buildings or the city level, which cannot address decisions related to masterplan developments on large brownfield sites. This paper investigates the drivers for building demolition or retention and adaptation decisions at the masterplan scale. Expert interviews and three case studies are used to explore how and why decisions to demolish, or to retain and adapt, are made at this scale. The research compared three different geopolitical contexts: Cambridge in the UK; Eindhoven in the Netherlands; and Sydney in Australia. Additional factors and complexities that should be considered at the masterplan scale are identified. The theoretical underpinnings of urban development processes are used to explain these complexities in relation to four existing models and demonstrate that no one model is adequate to describe the interactions. With increasing awareness of climate change impacts, it is critical that demolition decisions on masterplan developments are reviewed in the light of retaining carbon as well as heritage.

Practice relevance

This research demonstrates the different and specific concerns applying to demolition and retention on masterplan scale sites compared with the individual building scale. Although the evidence shows that decisions are context specific, the criteria as identified and categorised within this research offer a useful tool for stakeholders when establishing their priorities and approaches to decisions to demolish or retain and adapt within a masterplan context. This should help to avoid contested decisions and can help community groups hoping to have an influence over the long-term decisions, as well as developers looking to retain good relationships with the local community. The identified criteria can support planners and local authorities responsible for approving masterplan developments to better understand the factors relevant to each decision, including the importance of retaining flexibility throughout to enable response to changing circumstances.

Citation

Baker, H., Moncaster, A., Wilkinson, S., & Remøy, H. (2023). Demolition or retention of buildings: Drivers at the masterplan scale. Buildings and Cities, 4(1), 488-506. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.308

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 28, 2023
Online Publication Date Jul 21, 2023
Publication Date Jul 21, 2023
Deposit Date Jul 26, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jul 26, 2023
Journal Buildings & Cities
Print ISSN 2632-6655
Electronic ISSN 2632-6655
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 4
Issue 1
Pages 488-506
DOI https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.308
Keywords Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law; Urban Studies; Environmental Science (miscellaneous); Building and Construction; Geography, Planning and Development; Architecture
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10979416

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations