Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Task-specific training versus usual care to improve upper limb function after stroke: The “Task-AT Home” randomised controlled trial protocol

van Vliet, Paulette; Carey, Leeanne Mary; Turton, Ailie; Kwakkel, Gert; Palazzi, Kerrin; Oldmeadow, Christopher; Searles, Andrew; Lavis, Heidi; Middleton, Sandy; Galloway, Margaret; Dimech-Betancourt, Bleydy; O'Keefe, Sophie; Tavener, Meredith

Task-specific training versus usual care to improve upper limb function after stroke: The “Task-AT Home” randomised controlled trial protocol Thumbnail


Authors

Paulette van Vliet

Leeanne Mary Carey

Ailie Turton Ailie.Turton@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Occupational Therapy

Gert Kwakkel

Kerrin Palazzi

Christopher Oldmeadow

Andrew Searles

Heidi Lavis

Sandy Middleton

Margaret Galloway

Bleydy Dimech-Betancourt

Sophie O'Keefe

Meredith Tavener



Abstract

Background: Sixty percent of people have non-functional arms 6 months after stroke. More effective treatments are needed. Cochrane Reviews show low-quality evidence that task-specific training improves upper limb function. Our feasibility trial showed 56 h of task-specific training over 6 weeks resulted in an increase of a median 6 points on the Action Research Arm test (ARAT), demonstrating the need for more definitive evidence from a larger randomised controlled trial. Task-AT Home is a two-arm, assessor-blinded, multicentre randomised, controlled study, conducted in the home setting. Aim: The objective is to determine whether task-specific training is a more effective treatment than usual care, for improving upper limb function, amount of upper limb use, and health related quality of life at 6 weeks and 6 months after intervention commencement. Our primary hypothesis is that upper limb function will achieve a ≥ 5 point improvement on the ARAT in the task-specific training group compared to the usual care group, after 6 weeks of intervention. Methods: Participants living at home, with remaining upper limb deficit, are recruited at 3 months after stroke from sites in NSW and Victoria, Australia. Following baseline assessment, participants are randomised to 6 weeks of either task-specific or usual care intervention, stratified for upper limb function based on the ARAT score. The task-specific group receive 14 h of therapist-led task-specific training plus 42 h of guided self-practice. The primary outcome measure is the ARAT at 6 weeks. Secondary measures include the Motor Activity Log (MAL) at 6 weeks and the ARAT, MAL and EQ5D-5 L at 6 months. Assessments occur at baseline, after 6 weeks of intervention, and at 6 months after intervention commencement. Analysis will be intention to treat using a generalised linear mixed model to report estimated mean differences in scores between the two groups at each timepoint with 95% confidence interval and value of p. Discussion: If the task-specific home-based training programme is more effective than usual care in improving arm function, implementation of the programme into clinical practice would potentially lead to improvements in upper limb function and quality of life for people with stroke. Clinical Trial Registration: ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12617001631392p.aspx

Citation

van Vliet, P., Carey, L. M., Turton, A., Kwakkel, G., Palazzi, K., Oldmeadow, C., …Tavener, M. (2023). Task-specific training versus usual care to improve upper limb function after stroke: The “Task-AT Home” randomised controlled trial protocol. Frontiers in Neurology, 14, Article 1140017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1140017

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date May 4, 2023
Online Publication Date Jun 29, 2023
Publication Date Jun 29, 2023
Deposit Date Jul 21, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jul 21, 2023
Journal Frontiers in Neurology
Electronic ISSN 1664-2295
Publisher Frontiers Media
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 14
Article Number 1140017
DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1140017
Keywords stroke, upper limb, rehabilitation, task-specific, therapy
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10941529

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations