Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

A prospective comparison of invasive and non‐invasive blood pressure in children undergoing cardiac catheterization

Beringer, Richard; Keith, Alastair; Jones, Elin; Murphy, Tim; White, Paul

Authors

Richard Beringer

Alastair Keith

Elin Jones

Tim Murphy

Paul White Paul.White@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Applied Statistics



Abstract

Background: Blood pressure measurement is a standard of monitoring during general anesthesia. Invasive measurement is considered the gold standard but is less commonly used than non-invasive. Automated oscillometric blood pressure devices measure the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and use an algorithm to determine the systolic and diastolic pressures. Few devices have been validated in children, particularly during anesthesia. Few studies have assessed the agreement between invasive and non-invasive blood pressure measurements in children. Methods: This was a multi-center prospective observational study of children under 16 years undergoing cardiac catheterization with general anesthesia. Paired invasive and non-invasive blood pressure measurements were recorded for each patient during stable periods of the procedure. Correlation within and between sites was assessed with Pearson's correlation coefficient, and agreement was examined using Bland–Altman methodology to determine bias. Agreement during episodes of hypotension and for age and weight was also determined. Bias greater than 5 mmHg and standard deviation greater than 8 mmHg was considered clinically significant. The primary end point was agreement of MAP measurements. Results: A total of 683 paired blood pressure values were collected from 254 children in three pediatric hospitals. Median [IQR] age and weight were 3 [1–7] years and 13.9 [8–23] Kg. The overall bias (SD) for mean arterial pressure values was 7.2 (11.4) mmHg. During hypotension (190 readings), the bias (SD) was 15 (11.0) mmHg. The non-invasive MAP was frequently higher than invasive MAP during infancy, and lower in older children. Conclusion: Automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement is unreliable in anesthetized children during cardiac catheterization. Invasive pressure measurement should be considered for high-risk cases.

Citation

Beringer, R., Keith, A., Jones, E., Murphy, T., & White, P. (in press). A prospective comparison of invasive and non‐invasive blood pressure in children undergoing cardiac catheterization. Pediatric Anesthesia, 33(10), 816-822. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14723

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 22, 2023
Online Publication Date Jun 30, 2023
Deposit Date Jun 27, 2023
Publicly Available Date Jul 1, 2024
Journal Pediatric Anesthesia
Print ISSN 1155-5645
Electronic ISSN 1460-9592
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 33
Issue 10
Pages 816-822
DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14723
Keywords Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10882597