Bristol’s inclusive growth strategy: Excavating the discourse of the One City Plan

Atkinson, Rob; Tallon, Andrew

Abstract

Over the last twenty years, particularly since the publication of the Barca report (2009) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2014) report, a new ‘conventional wisdom’/ paradigm has emerged for local development – the place-based approach. This entails a commitment to inclusive growth and productivity-driven growth. However, two key issues remain: what does inclusive growth mean and how can it be reconciled with productivity-driven growth? This article provides a discourse analysis of one such attempt – Bristol’s inclusive growth strategy and the associated One City Plan, a place-based approach. Our aim is to excavate and scrutinise the discourse(s) that have shaped the strategy to provide a better understanding of its origins and possible future development (i.e. its sustainability) and how it seeks to discursively reconcile these two key issues whilst taking into account the ‘structural limitations’ it faces. Finally we seek to briefly draw out the wider implications of this for the place-based approach.

Citation

Atkinson, R., & Tallon, A. (in press). Bristol’s inclusive growth strategy: Excavating the discourse of the One City Plan. Town Planning Review, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2023.4

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Oct 24, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Jan 23, 2023
• Deposit Date: Jan 24, 2023
• Publicly Available Date: Jan 24, 2023
• Journal: Town Planning Review
• Print ISSN: 0041-0020
• Electronic ISSN: 1478-341X
• Publisher: Liverpool University Press
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Pages: 1-20
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2023.4
• Keywords: Bristol, One City Plan, inclusive growth, discourse analysis, strategic vision
• Public URL: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10382032
• Publisher URL: https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/journal/tpr
• Additional Information: The article is based on research carried out as part of the Horizon 2020 project: Inequality, Urbanization and Territorial Cohesion: Developing the European Social Model of Economic Growth and Democratic Capacity (COHSMO). The project was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 727058. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the funding organisation or the COHSMO consortium.