Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Comparison of the performance of hybrid traffic signal patterns and conventional alternatives when accounting for both pedestrians and vehicles

Montazeri, Farzaneh; Errico, Fausto; Pellecuer, Luc

Comparison of the performance of hybrid traffic signal patterns and conventional alternatives when accounting for both pedestrians and vehicles Thumbnail


Authors

Farzaneh Montazeri

Fausto Errico

Profile Image

Luc Pellecuer Luc.Pellecuer@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Civil Engineering



Abstract

Traffic control systems are crucial for managing traffic flows. Their main function is to reduce interactions among users for safety reasons, while minimizing the travel times. Researchers often concentrate on the cycle length, whose impact on travel times is directly measurable. However, the choice of the signal pattern may also have a great potential to reduce travel times and unsafe situations. This potential is yet to be thoroughly investigated. In this work, we are interested in comparing different signal patterns in terms of the number of potential conflicts and delay time for both drivers and pedestrians. To this end, we first select three commonly adopted signal patterns, namely the Exclusive Pedestrian Phase (EPP), the Leading Through Interval (LTI) and the Two-Way Crossing (TWC). We then generalize existing methods for measuring user delay and safety for these three signal patterns. Moreover, we investigate a hypothetical hybrid pattern obtained by dynamically adapting the signal pattern to real-time data. The proposed methodology is applied to a case study considering an isolated intersection in Montreal, Canada. We perform computational experiments geared towards determining the best pattern according to ad hoc performance indicators and user flows. Results show that the EPP and LTI patterns generally perform better than TWC. EPP generally outperforms LTI when measuring the number of potential conflicts, while LTI outperforms EPP when considering delay times. Furthermore, the hypothetical hybrid pattern shows a positive but overall limited impact regarding both delay times and number of potential conflicts.

Citation

Montazeri, F., Errico, F., & Pellecuer, L. (2022). Comparison of the performance of hybrid traffic signal patterns and conventional alternatives when accounting for both pedestrians and vehicles. Sustainability, 14(20), Article 13667. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013667

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 18, 2022
Online Publication Date Oct 21, 2022
Publication Date Oct 21, 2022
Deposit Date Oct 25, 2022
Publicly Available Date Oct 25, 2022
Journal Sustainability (Switzerland)
Print ISSN 2071-1050
Electronic ISSN 2071-1050
Publisher MDPI
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 14
Issue 20
Article Number 13667
Series Title Road Traffic Engineering and Sustainable Transportation - The Second Edition
DOI https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013667
Keywords Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law; Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment; Geography, Planning and Development; Building and Construction
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10106080
Publisher URL https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/20/13667
Related Public URLs https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/special_issues/Road_Traffic_Engineering_Second_Edition

Files




You might also like



Downloadable Citations