The multidimensional recognition of religion

Thompson, Simon; Modood, Tariq

Abstract

In this article, we present a case for the recognition of multiple religions, arguing that states have a non-absolute duty to recognise religions which it is likely they should discharge along different dimensions and to different degrees. More concretely, we focus on several Western European states (or regions thereof), arguing that they would be more legitimate if they were to recognise an extensive range of faiths and ethno-religious groups. In order to make this argument, we deploy a method of iterative contextualism, consisting of two interlocking steps which can be thought of as obverse halves of a hermeneutic circle. First we identify and describe two cross-contextual principles, which we call identification and discretionary recognition. Then we suggest how it may be shown that these principles are already present to a significant degree in Denmark, Finland and Alsace-Moselle–the three contexts with which we are particularly concerned here. This, then, is a normatively robust and contextually sensitive argument for the multidimensional recognition of religion by a state, and at the same time it explains how we apply the method of iterative contextualism.

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jun 16, 2022
• Online Publication Date: Sep 13, 2022
• Deposit Date: Oct 27, 2022
• Publicly Available Date: Oct 27, 2022
• Journal: Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
• Print ISSN: 1369-8230
• Electronic ISSN: 1743-8772
• Publisher: Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Pages: 1-22
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2115228
• Keywords: Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy, Religion; identification; discretionary recognition; contextualism; establishment
• Public URL: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/10005551
• Publisher URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13698230.2022.2115228