Katherine Pollard Katherine.Pollard@uwe.ac.uk
Academic Specialist - HAS
How midwives' discursive practices contribute to the maintenance of the status quo in English maternity care
Pollard, Katherine
Authors
Abstract
Background: poor relationships between maternity care professionals still contribute to poor outcomes for childbearing women, although issues concerning power, gender, professionalism and the medicalisation of birth have been identified and discussed as germane to this situation for nearly three decades. Although power relationships and communication issues are known to affect the way maternity care professionals in the UK work together, there has been no study of the interplay between these factors, or of how semiotic aspects of professionals' communication relate to it. Aim: to explore how National Health Service midwives' discursive practices relate to the status quo; that is, how they contribute either to maintaining or challenging traditional discourses concerning power, gender, professionalism and the medicalisation of birth. Method: in a qualitative study within a critical discourse analysis framework, data were collected from maternity care professionals and women within one English maternity unit, through semi-structured interviews and observation of physical behaviour and naturally occurring conversation. Findings: midwives in the unit revealed an inconsistent professional identity, sometimes challenging established hierarchies and power relationships, but often reinforcing traditional notions of gender, professionalism and the medicalisation of birth through their discursive practices. Conclusions: given the known effect of wider social factors on maternity care, it is not surprising that the status quo persists, and that problems linked to these factors are still commonplace. This situation is compounded by the conflicting obligations under which UK midwives are forced to practice. These findings may have implications for midwives' capacity to respond to current challenges facing the profession. © 2010 Elsevier Ltd.
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | Oct 1, 2011 |
Deposit Date | Sep 15, 2010 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 17, 2016 |
Journal | Midwifery |
Print ISSN | 0266-6138 |
Electronic ISSN | 1532-3099 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 27 |
Issue | 5 |
Pages | 612-619 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.06.018 |
Keywords | midwives, discursive practices, professionalism, gender, medicalisation, birth, power, critical discourse analysis |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/958820 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2010.06.018 |
Contract Date | Apr 17, 2016 |
Files
KPollard_Midwifery_May_10.pdf
(359 Kb)
PDF
KPollard_Midwifery_May_10.doc
(121 Kb)
Document
You might also like
An evaluation of the foundation degree in healthcare science
(-0001)
Report
Public involvement in research: Assessing impact through a realist evaluation
(2014)
Journal Article
The University of the West of England
(2014)
Book Chapter
The need for interprofessional working
(2014)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search