Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Developing a validated urinary diary: Phase 1

Bright, Elizabeth; Cotterill, Nikki; Drake, Marcus; Abrams, Paul

Authors

Elizabeth Bright

Profile Image

N Nikki Cotterill Nikki.Cotterill@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Long Term Conditions (Continence Care)

Marcus Drake

Paul Abrams



Abstract

Aims: To develop and validate a urinary diary, using the psychometric validation protocol applied to all International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ) modules. Methods: Patient and clinician opinion was sought on diary content, format, and duration using interviews and questionnaires. Content deemed essential for inclusion were incorporated into four draft diary formats (Phase 1a). Four rounds of content validation using patient-completed diaries or patient interviews and one round of clinician opinion were undertaken, before a consensus was achieved (Phase 1b). Results: Phase 1a: 27 patients were interviewed and 30 clinicians returned a questionnaire regarding diary content, format and duration. Content deemed essential for inclusion was identified. Patients reported no format preference but preferred a diary of ≤7 days. Clinicians preferred a 3-day diary in single sheet format. Phase 1b: 75 of 200 (37.5%) patients returned completed draft diaries. Equal preference for the two portrait format diaries was expressed. Twenty-six clinicians returned a questionnaire regarding their preference for either of these two options, with 69% (18/26) selecting the one with a printed 24-hr clock. Optimal diary duration was 4 days. Frequency, voided volume, fluid intake (amount, time and type), time of incontinence episode, and bladder sensation were supported for inclusion in the final diary. Conclusions: Diary content, format, and duration deemed essential by both patients and clinicians have been identified in this preliminary phase, allowing the formation of a draft urinary diary. Further tests of diary validity, reliability and responsiveness will be evaluated in Phase 2 of the study. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Citation

Bright, E., Cotterill, N., Drake, M., & Abrams, P. (2012). Developing a validated urinary diary: Phase 1. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 31(5), 625-633. https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21254

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 21, 2011
Online Publication Date Jan 24, 2012
Publication Date Jun 1, 2012
Journal Neurourology and Urodynamics
Print ISSN 0733-2467
Electronic ISSN 1520-6777
Publisher Wiley
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 31
Issue 5
Pages 625-633
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21254
Keywords urinary diary, frequency-volume chart, bladder diary, content validity, questionnaire, patient-centred assessment, interviews
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/946677
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21254
Additional Information Additional Information : This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Bright, E., Cotterill, N., Drake, M. and Abrams, P. (2012) Developing a validated urinary diary – phase 1. Neurourology and Urodynamics, 31 (5). pp. 625-633. ISSN 0733-2467, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.21254. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.