Skip to main content

Research Repository

See what's under the surface

Advanced Search

Empirical evaluation of the uncanny valley hypothesis fails to confirm the predicted effect of motion

Piwek, Lukasz; McKay, Lawrie S.; Pollick, Frank E.

Authors

Lukasz Piwek lukasz.piwek@uwe.ac.uk

Lawrie S. McKay

Frank E. Pollick



Abstract

The uncanny valley hypothesis states that the acceptability of an artificial character will not increase linearly in relation to its likeness to human form. Instead, after an initial rise in acceptability there will be a pronounced decrease when the character is similar, but not identical to human form (Mori, 1970/2012). Moreover, it has been claimed but never directly tested that movement would accentuate this dip and make moving characters less acceptable. We used a number of full-body animated computer characters along with a parametrically defined motion set to examine the effect of motion quality on the uncanny valley. We found that improving the motion quality systematically improved the acceptability of the characters. In particular, the character classified in the deepest location of the uncanny valley became more acceptable when it was animated. Our results showed that although an uncanny valley was found for static characters, the deepening of the valley with motion, originally predicted by Mori (1970/2012), was not obtained. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date Mar 1, 2014
Journal Cognition
Print ISSN 0010-0277
Electronic ISSN 1873-7838
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 130
Issue 3
Pages 271-277
APA6 Citation Piwek, L., McKay, L. S., & Pollick, F. E. (2014). Empirical evaluation of the uncanny valley hypothesis fails to confirm the predicted effect of motion. Cognition, 130(3), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.001
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.001
Keywords uncanny valley, biological motion, action perception, affect recognition, animation
Publisher URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.001
Related Public URLs http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027713002114




Downloadable Citations

;