Review of the techniques used in motor‐cognitive human‐robot skill transfer

Guan, Yuan; Wang, Ning; Yang, Chenguang

Abstract

A conventional robot programming method extensively limits the reusability of skills in the developmental aspect. Engineers programme a robot in a targeted manner for the realisation of predefined skills. The low reusability of general-purpose robot skills is mainly reflected in inability in novel and complex scenarios. Skill transfer aims to transfer human skills to general-purpose manipulators or mobile robots to replicate human-like behaviours. Skill transfer methods that are commonly used at present, such as learning from demonstrated (LfD) or imitation learning, endow the robot with the expert's low-level motor and high-level decision-making ability, so that skills can be reproduced and generalised according to perceived context. The improvement of robot cognition usually relates to an improvement in the autonomous high-level decision-making ability. Based on the idea of establishing a generic or specialised robot skill library, robots are expected to autonomously reason about the needs for using skills and plan compound movements according to sensory input. In recent years, in this area, many successful studies have demonstrated their effectiveness. Herein, a detailed review is provided on the transferring techniques of skills, applications, advancements, and limitations, especially in the LfD. Future research directions are also suggested.

Citation

Guan, Y., Wang, N., & Yang, C. (2021). Review of the techniques used in motor‐cognitive human‐robot skill transfer. Cognitive Computation and Systems, 3(3), 229-252. https://doi.org/10.1049/ccs2.12025

• Journal Article Type: Review
• Acceptance Date: Apr 7, 2021
• Online Publication Date: May 30, 2021
• Publication Date: Sep 1, 2021
• Deposit Date: Aug 29, 2021
• Publicly Available Date: Aug 31, 2021
• Journal: Cognitive Computation and Systems
• Electronic ISSN: 2517-7567
• Publisher: Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET)
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 3
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 229-252
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/ccs2.12025
• Public URL: https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/7717895