Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality

Harvey, Adam Charles; Vrij, Aldert; Leal, Sharon; Deeb, Haneen; Hope, Lorraine; Mann, Samantha

Amplifying recall after delays via initial interviewing: Inoculating truth-tellers' memory as a function of encoding quality Thumbnail


Authors

Adam Charles Harvey

Aldert Vrij

Sharon Leal

Haneen Deeb

Lorraine Hope

Samantha Mann



Abstract

Typically, truth-tellers report more detailed statements when interviewed immediately, compared to after delays (displaying forgetting), whereas liars report statements containing similar amounts of detail when interviewed immediately or after a delay (displaying a metacognitive error). Accordingly, the diagnostic utility of the ‘richness-of-detail’ cue is reduced after delays. We investigated if initial interviewing can facilitate lie-detection using the richness-of-detail cue in sub-optimal memorial conditions, that is, when (i) interviewing occurred after a three-week delay and (ii) truth-teller's attention during encoding was manipulated. Participants (n = 152) witnessed an interaction, that was meaningful to (and intentionally encoded by) liars (n = 50) and half of truth-tellers (n = 51), but meaningless (and incidentally encoded by) the remaining truth-tellers (n = 51). Participants were interviewed after three weeks. Half of the intentional liars and half of the intentional and incidental truth-tellers were also interviewed immediately (initial interview-present condition), whereas the remaining participants received no immediate interview (initial interview-absent condition). Results showed intentional and incidental truth-tellers reported after three weeks more detail in the initial interview-present (versus absent) condition, whereas intentional liars' statements were unaffected by initial interviewing condition. After three weeks, more intentional liars and intentional truth-tellers were correctly distinguished in the initial interview-present (versus absent) condition.

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 30, 2020
Online Publication Date Jul 16, 2020
Publication Date Sep 1, 2020
Deposit Date Mar 12, 2021
Publicly Available Date Jan 17, 2022
Journal Acta Psychologica
Print ISSN 0001-6918
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 209
Article Number 103130
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103130
Keywords Initial interviewing, Memory, Forgetting, Encoding
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/7197836

Files







You might also like



Downloadable Citations