Andrew Wakefield
Experimentally comparing the attractiveness of domestic lights to insects: Do LEDs attract fewer insects than conventional light types?
Wakefield, Andrew; Broyles, Moth; Stone, Emma L.; Jones, Gareth; Harris, Stephen
Authors
Moth Broyles
Dr Emma Stone Emma4.Stone@uwe.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer Environmental Biology
Gareth Jones
Stephen Harris
Abstract
© 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. LED lighting is predicted to constitute 70% of the outdoor and residential lighting markets by 2020. While the use of LEDs promotes energy and cost savings relative to traditional lighting technologies, little is known about the effects these broad-spectrum “white” lights will have on wildlife, human health, animal welfare, and disease transmission. We conducted field experiments to compare the relative attractiveness of four commercially available “domestic” lights, one traditional (tungsten filament) and three modern (compact fluorescent, “cool-white” LED and “warm-white” LED), to aerial insects, particularly Diptera. We found that LEDs attracted significantly fewer insects than other light sources, but found no significant difference in attraction between the “cool-” and “warm-white” LEDs. Fewer flies were attracted to LEDs than alternate light sources, including fewer Culicoides midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Use of LEDs has the potential to mitigate disturbances to wildlife and occurrences of insect-borne diseases relative to competing lighting technologies. However, we discuss the risks associated with broad-spectrum lighting and net increases in lighting resulting from reduced costs of LED technology.
Citation
Wakefield, A., Broyles, M., Stone, E. L., Jones, G., & Harris, S. (2016). Experimentally comparing the attractiveness of domestic lights to insects: Do LEDs attract fewer insects than conventional light types?. Ecology and Evolution, 6(22), 8028-8036. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2527
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 6, 2016 |
Online Publication Date | Oct 13, 2016 |
Publication Date | Nov 1, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Oct 11, 2018 |
Publicly Available Date | Oct 11, 2018 |
Journal | Ecology and Evolution |
Electronic ISSN | 2045-7758 |
Publisher | Wiley Open Access |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 6 |
Issue | 22 |
Pages | 8028-8036 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2527 |
Keywords | broad‐spectrum lighting; Ceratopogonidae; color temperature; compact fluorescent lights; Culicoides; disease; filament; light‐emitting diode; vector |
Public URL | https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/905757 |
Publisher URL | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2527 |
Files
Wakefield_et_al-2016-Ecology_and_Evolution (1).pdf
(545 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Assessing the impact of festival music on bat activity
(2023)
Journal Article
What drives bat activity at field boundaries?
(2022)
Journal Article
Lighting up our waterways: Impacts of a current mitigation strategy on Riparian bats
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About UWE Bristol Research Repository
Administrator e-mail: repository@uwe.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search