Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Global research priorities for interpersonal violence prevention: A modified Delphi study

Mikton, Christopher R.; Tanaka, Masako; Tomlinson, Mark; Streiner, David; Tonmyr, Lil; Lee, Bandy; Fisher, Jane; Hegadoren, Kathy; Pim, Joam Evans; Wang, Shr-Jie Sharlenna; MacMillan, Harriet

Global research priorities for interpersonal violence prevention: A modified Delphi study Thumbnail


Authors

Masako Tanaka

Mark Tomlinson

David Streiner

Lil Tonmyr

Bandy Lee

Jane Fisher

Kathy Hegadoren

Joam Evans Pim

Shr-Jie Sharlenna Wang

Harriet MacMillan



Abstract

© 2017, World Health Organization. All rights reserved. Objective To establish global research priorities for interpersonal violence prevention using a systematic approach. Methods Research priorities were identified in a three-round process involving two surveys. In round 1, 95 global experts in violence prevention proposed research questions to be ranked in round 2. Questions were collated and organized according to the four-step public health approach to violence prevention. In round 2, 280 international experts ranked the importance of research in the four steps, and the various substeps, of the public health approach. In round 3, 131 international experts ranked the importance of detailed research questions on the public health step awarded the highest priority in round 2. Findings In round 2, “developing, implementing and evaluating interventions” was the step of the public health approach awarded the highest priority for four of the six types of violence considered (i.e. child maltreatment, intimate partner violence, armed violence and sexual violence) but not for youth violence or elder abuse. In contrast, “scaling up interventions and evaluating their cost-effectiveness” was ranked lowest for all types of violence. In round 3, research into “developing, implementing and evaluating interventions” that addressed parenting or laws to regulate the use of firearms was awarded the highest priority. The key limitations of the study were response and attrition rates among survey respondents. However, these rates were in line with similar priority-setting exercises. Conclusion These findings suggest it is premature to scale up violence prevention interventions. Developing and evaluating smaller-scale interventions should be the funding priority.

Citation

Mikton, C. R., Tanaka, M., Tomlinson, M., Streiner, D., Tonmyr, L., Lee, B., …MacMillan, H. (2017). Global research priorities for interpersonal violence prevention: A modified Delphi study. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 95(1), 36-48. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.172965

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Aug 31, 2016
Online Publication Date Oct 20, 2016
Publication Date Jan 1, 2017
Deposit Date Oct 3, 2016
Publicly Available Date Oct 27, 2016
Journal Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Print ISSN 0042-9686
Electronic ISSN 1564-0604
Publisher World Health Organization (WHO)
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 95
Issue 1
Pages 36-48
DOI https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.16.172965
Keywords global violence prevention, research priorities, delphi study
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/900861
Publisher URL http://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.16.172965.pdf?ua=1

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations