Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Development of a core set of outcome measures for OAB treatment

Foust-Wright, Caroline; Wissig, Stephanie; Stowell, Caleb; Olson, Elizabeth; Anderson, Anita; Anger, Jennifer; Cardozo, Linda; Cotterill, Nikki; Gormley, Elizabeth Ann; Toozs-Hobson, Philip; Heesakkers, John; Herbison, Peter; Moore, Kate; McKinney, Jessica; Morse, Abraham; Pulliam, Samantha; Szonyi, George; Wagg, Adrian; Milsom, Ian

Development of a core set of outcome measures for OAB treatment Thumbnail


Authors

Caroline Foust-Wright

Stephanie Wissig

Caleb Stowell

Elizabeth Olson

Anita Anderson

Jennifer Anger

Linda Cardozo

Profile Image

N Nikki Cotterill Nikki.Cotterill@uwe.ac.uk
Professor of Long Term Conditions (Continence Care)

Elizabeth Ann Gormley

Philip Toozs-Hobson

John Heesakkers

Peter Herbison

Kate Moore

Jessica McKinney

Abraham Morse

Samantha Pulliam

George Szonyi

Adrian Wagg

Ian Milsom



Abstract

© 2017, The Author(s). Introduction and hypothesis: Standardized measures enable the comparison of outcomes across providers and treatments giving valuable information for improving care quality and efficacy. The aim of this project was to define a minimum standard set of outcome measures and case-mix factors for evaluating the care of patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Methods: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) convened an international working group (WG) of leading clinicians and patients to engage in a structured method for developing a core outcome set. Consensus was determined by a modified Delphi process, and discussions were supported by both literature review and patient input. Results: The standard set measures outcomes of care for adults seeking treatment for OAB, excluding residents of long-term care facilities. The WG focused on treatment outcomes identified as most important key outcome domains to patients: symptom burden and bother, physical functioning, emotional health, impact of symptoms and treatment on quality of life, and success of treatment. Demographic information and case-mix factors that may affect these outcomes were also included. Conclusions: The standardized outcome set for evaluating clinical care is appropriate for use by all health providers caring for patients with OAB, regardless of specialty or geographic location, and provides key data for quality improvement activities and research.

Citation

Foust-Wright, C., Wissig, S., Stowell, C., Olson, E., Anderson, A., Anger, J., …Milsom, I. (2017). Development of a core set of outcome measures for OAB treatment. International Urogynecology Journal, 28(12), 1785-1793. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3481-6

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Sep 6, 2017
Online Publication Date Sep 25, 2017
Publication Date Dec 1, 2017
Deposit Date Jun 21, 2018
Publicly Available Date Jun 21, 2018
Journal International Urogynecology Journal
Print ISSN 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN 1433-3023
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 28
Issue 12
Pages 1785-1793
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3481-6
Keywords overactive bladder, outcome measures, standards set, questionnaires
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/881427
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3481-6