Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Measuring quality in community nursing: A mixed methods study

Horrocks, Sue; Pollard, Katherine; Duncan, Lorna; Petsoulas, Christina; Gibbard, Emma; Cook, Jane; McDonald, Ruth; Wye, Lesley; Allen, Pauline; Husband, Christopher; Harland, Lizanne; Cameron, Ailsa; Salisbury, Chris

Measuring quality in community nursing: A mixed methods study Thumbnail


Authors

Sue Horrocks Susan.Horrocks@uwe.ac.uk
Occasional Associate Lecturer - HAS

Lorna Duncan

Christina Petsoulas

Emma Gibbard

Jane Cook

Ruth McDonald

Lesley Wye

Pauline Allen

Christopher Husband

Lizanne Harland

Ailsa Cameron

Chris Salisbury



Contributors

Kuinam J Kim
Editor

Nikolai Joukov
Editor

Abstract

Abstract
Background
High-quality nursing care is crucial for patients with complex conditions and co-morbidities living at home, but such care is largely invisible to health planners and managers. Nursing care quality in acute settings is typically measured using a range of different quality measures; however, little is known about how service quality is measured in community nursing.

Objective
To establish which quality indicators are selected for community nursing; how these are selected and applied; and their usefulness to service users (patients and/or carers), commissioners and provider staff.

Design
A mixed-methods study comprising three phases:
1)A national survey of ‘Commissioning for Quality and Innovation’ indicators applied to community nursing care in 2014/2015. Data were analysed descriptively using SPSS 20.0.
2)In-depth case study in five sites. Qualitative data were collected through observations, interviews, focus groups and documents. Thematic analysis was conducted using QSR NVivo 10.

Findings from the first two phases were synthesised using a theoretical framework to examine how local and distal contexts affecting care provision impacted on selection and application of quality indicators for community nursing.

3)Validity testing the findings and associated draft good practice guidance through a series of stakeholder engagement events held in venues across England.

Setting
The national survey was conducted by telephone and e-mail. Each case study site comprised a Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and its associated provider of community nursing services.

Participants
Survey: 145 (68.7%) CCGs across England.

Case study: NHS England national and regional quality leads (n=5); commissioners (n=19); provider managers (n=32); registered community nurses (n=45); adult patients (n=14) receiving care in their own homes and/or carers (n=7).

Findings
A wide range of indicators was used nationally, with a major focus on organisational processes.
Lack of nurse and service user involvement in indicator selection processes impacted negatively on their application and perceived usefulness. Indicator data collection was hampered by problematic IT software and connectivity and inter-organisational system incompatibility. Frontline staff considered indicators designed for acute settings inappropriate for use in community settings. Indicators did not reflect aspects of care such as time spent, kindness and respect, highly valued by frontline staff and service user participants.
Workshop delegates (commissioners, provider managers, frontline staff and service users, n=242) endorsed the findings and draft good practice guidance.

Limitations
On-going service re-organisation during the study period affected access to participants in some sites. Limited available data precluded in-depth documentary analysis.

Conclusions
Current quality indicators for community nursing are of limited use:
Commissioners and provider managers should ensure that service users and frontline staff are involved in identifying and selecting indicators.
Difficulties with connectivity and compatibility should be resolved before rolling new IT packages out into practice.
Quality measures designed for acute settings should not be applied in community settings without modification.
A mix of qualitative and quantitative methods should be used to determine service quality

Future work
Research investigating appropriate modifications and associated costs of administering quality indicator schemes in integrated care settings.

Funding details
The study was funded by the NIHR Health Service and Delivery Research programme.

Citation

Horrocks, S., Pollard, K., Duncan, L., Petsoulas, C., Gibbard, E., Cook, J., …Salisbury, C. (2018). Measuring quality in community nursing: A mixed methods study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 6(18), 1-166. https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06180

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Jun 12, 2017
Online Publication Date Apr 1, 2018
Publication Date May 1, 2018
Deposit Date Jun 19, 2017
Publicly Available Date Jun 28, 2019
Print ISSN 2050-4349
Electronic ISSN 2050-4357
Publisher NIHR Journals Library
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 6
Issue 18
Pages 1-166
DOI https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06180
Keywords community nursing, quality measurement, mixed methods, commissioning, public engagement, PPI
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/870077
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr06180

Files


Measuring quality in community nursing (6.9 Mb)
PDF

Copyright Statement
© Queen’s Printer and Controller of HMSO 2018. This work was produced by Horrocks et al. under the terms of a commissioning
contract issued by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. This issue may be freely reproduced for the purposes of
private research and study and extracts (or indeed, the full report) may be included in professional journals provided that
suitable acknowledgement is made and the reproduction is not associated with any form of advertising. Applications for
commercial reproduction should be addressed to: NIHR Journals Library, National Institute for Health Research, Evaluation, Trials
and Studies Coordinating Centre, Alpha House, University of Southampton Science Park, Southampton SO16 7NS, UK.







You might also like



Downloadable Citations