Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Influence of the different “patient global assessment” formulations on disease activity score by different indices in rheumatoid arthritis

Ferreira, Ricardo JO; Eug�nio, Gisela; Ndosi, Mwidimi; Silva, Cristiana; Medeiros, Catarina; Duarte, C�tia; da Silva, Jose AP

Influence of the different “patient global assessment” formulations on disease activity score by different indices in rheumatoid arthritis Thumbnail


Authors

Ricardo JO Ferreira

Gisela Eug�nio

Profile Image

Dr Mwidimi Ndosi Mwidimi.Ndosi@uwe.ac.uk
Associate Professor in Nursing Rheumatology

Cristiana Silva

Catarina Medeiros

C�tia Duarte

Jose AP da Silva



Abstract

© 2018, International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR). Patient global assessment (PGA) is included in almost all rheumatoid arthritis (RA) composite disease activity indices and definitions of remission. However, different PGA formulations exist and are used interchangeably in research and clinical practice. We investigated how five different PGA formulations used in four disease indices affect the remission rates. This was an ancillary analysis of data from a cross-sectional study in patients with RA. The data comprised the following: 28-joint counts, C-reactive protein, and five PGA formulations. Remission rate variation was assessed using five PGA formulations in each index (ACR/EULAR Boolean, CDAI, SDAI, and DAS28-CRP). PGA agreement was assessed by the following: Pearson’s correlation; Bland-Altman plots; paired samples t test; and establishing the proportion of patients who scored (i) all formulations within an interval of 20mm and (ii) each formulation ≤ 10mm. This analysis included 191 patients. PGA formulations presented good correlations (≥ 0.65), but Bland-Altman plots showed clinically significant differences, which were statistically confirmed by comparison of means. Just over a half (51.8%) of patients scored all PGA formulations within a 20-mm interval. The proportion of those scoring ≤ 10mm varied from 11.5 to 16.2%. When different formulations of PGA were used in each index, remission differences of up to 4.7, 4.7, 6.3, and 5.2% were observed. When formulations were used in their respective indices, as validated, the remission rates were similar (13.1, 13.6, 14.1, and 18.3%). Using PGA formulations interchangeably may have implications in the assessment of disease activity and in the attainment of remission, and this can impact upon management decisions.

Citation

Ferreira, R. J., Eugénio, G., Ndosi, M., Silva, C., Medeiros, C., Duarte, C., & da Silva, J. A. (2018). Influence of the different “patient global assessment” formulations on disease activity score by different indices in rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical Rheumatology, 37(7), 1963-1969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-018-4063-9

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 10, 2018
Online Publication Date Mar 10, 2018
Publication Date Jul 1, 2018
Deposit Date Mar 14, 2018
Publicly Available Date Mar 10, 2019
Journal Clinical Rheumatology
Print ISSN 0770-3198
Electronic ISSN 1434-9949
Publisher Springer Verlag
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 37
Issue 7
Pages 1963-1969
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-018-4063-9
Keywords rheumatoid arthritis, patient reported outcome measures, remission induction, patient preference, disease activity, patient global assessment
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/863788
Publisher URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-018-4063-9
Related Public URLs https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-018-4063-9
Additional Information Additional Information : The final publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-018-4063-9

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations