Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Community screening to determine the prevalence of carbapenemase producing organisms in East London, 2018

Henderson, Jennifer; Ciesielczuk, Holly; Nelson, Shona; Wilks, Mark

Authors

Jennifer Henderson

Holly Ciesielczuk

Mark Wilks



Abstract

Carbapenems are broad spectrum antibiotics reserved for patients who are extremely ill or suspected of having an infection caused by a multidrug resistant organism (Nordmann et al., 2011). Over the past ten years there has been a dramatic increase in resistance to carbapenems, seen worldwide, which is a growing cause for concern (figure 1).
Carbapenemases are enzymes, produced by an array of common Gram-negative organisms, which hydrolyse this class of antibiotic, conferring resistance (Papp-Wallace et al., 2011). The main protagonists are the “big five” carbapenemases, KPC, OXA-48, IMP, VIM and NDM, which have been reported across the UK. However, these reports are often a result of reactive screening, outbreaks, inpatient surveillance and from diagnostic samples. To date, there have been no studies investigating the prevalence of carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) in the UK community.
Objectives
To determine the prevalence of CPOs within the community serving Barts Health Trust: Screen 200 non-duplicate samples using boil extraction followed by a modified version of a published RT-PCR assay (Zee et al., 2014).

Methods
Sources of samples
This study was performed at Barts Health NHS Trust (BHT), the largest trust in the UK, which serves 2.5 million patients across three London boroughs: Tower Hamlets, Newham and Waltham Forest. A total of 200 non-duplicate community stool samples, received sequentially by the Microbiology Laboratory at BHT, were included. Patient age, sex and foreign travel history were extracted from the laboratory information management system (LIMS), enabling the identification of potential risk factors for CPO carriage.

Screening method
Screening was performed by transferring a pea-sized portion of stool into nutrient broth and enriching overnight at 37°C. The broth was sub-cultured onto mSuperCARBA (EOlabs, UK) selective medium and incubated for a further 18 - 24 hours at 37°C.
Colonies were identified by MALDI-TOF. All identified Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas species underwent antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) by disk diffusion, according to EUCAST guidelines, against meropenem, ertapenem, fosfomycin, mecillinam, amikacin, temocillin and piperacillin-tazobactam. All isolates, regardless of the AST results, were tested for possession of carbapenemase genes using a modified version of a published RT-PCR assay (Zee et al., 2014).

Results
Of the 200 community samples tested, only 1 patient tested positive for a CPO (NDM-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Of note, this patient had travelled to the Caribbean. Of the 199 who screened negative, 46 also had foreign travel listed, the most common countries visited being Turkey, Morocco and Bangladesh. No travel history was detailed for 122 patients and there were no clinical details for 31 patients. Patients ranged from 1-93 years of age.

Of the 20 isolates tested for the presence of a carbapenemase by PCR, 11 were indicated to be intermediate or resistant to either ertapenem or meropenem by AST.

Discussion
PHE guidelines state that patients from high-risk geographical locations such as Bangladesh, India, South East Asia, Italy, Turkey, Greece and Israel are at risk of CPO carriage and infection. At BHT, a significant proportion of our patient population originate from these high-risk locations and 22/46 of our study patients visited them in the last 12 months. However, only one CPO was detected in our community, giving a prevalence of just 0.5%. Furthermore, the CPO was detected in a patient who had travelled to the Caribbean, suggesting that we need to reconsider who is high-risk for CPO carriage and the relevance of national CPO rates, at least at a local level. In addition to foreign travel, previous hospitalisation is also considered a risk factor, however this cannot be determined from this study.
The AST results demonstrate that carbapenem resistance testing can not be used as the only tool for detecting carbapenemase producers.

Citation

Henderson, J., Ciesielczuk, H., Nelson, S., & Wilks, M. (2018, November). Community screening to determine the prevalence of carbapenemase producing organisms in East London, 2018. Poster presented at Federation of Infection Sciences Conference 2018

Presentation Conference Type Poster
Conference Name Federation of Infection Sciences Conference 2018
Start Date Nov 13, 2018
End Date Nov 15, 2018
Acceptance Date Sep 27, 2018
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Keywords carbapenemase producing organisms, community screening
Public URL https://uwe-repository.worktribe.com/output/860215
Additional Information Title of Conference or Conference Proceedings : Federation of Infection Sciences Conference 2018