Saheed O. Ajayi
Dynamic relationship between embodied and operational impacts of buildings
Ajayi, Saheed O.; Oyedele, Lukumon O.; Dauda, Jamiu A.
Lukumon Oyedele L.Oyedele@uwe.ac.uk
Professor in Enterprise & Project Management
Jamiu A. Dauda
Purpose: Buildings and their construction activities consume a significant proportion of mineral resources excavated from nature and contribute a large percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere. As a way of improving the sustainability of building construction and operation, various sustainable design appraisal standards have been developed across nations. Albeit criticism of the appraisal standards, evidence shows that increasing sustainability of the built environment has been engendered by such appraisal tools as BREEAM, Code for sustainable homes, LEED and CASBEE, among others. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the appraisal standards in engendering whole lifecycle environmental sustainability of the built environment.
Design/methodology/approach: In order to evaluate the adequacy of sustainability scores assigned to various lifecycle stages of buildings in the appraisal standards, four case studies of a block of classroom were modelled. Using Revit as a modelling platform, stage by stage lifecycle environmental impacts of the building were simulated through Green Building Studio and ATHENA Impact estimator. The resulting environmental impacts were then compared against the assessment score associated with each stage of building lifecycle in BREAAM and code for sustainable homes.
Findings: Results show that albeit the consensus that the appraisal standards engender sustainability practices in the AEC industry, total scores assigned to impacts at each stage of building lifecycle is disproportionate to the simulated whole-life environmental impacts associated with the stages in some instances.
Originality/Value: As the study reveals both strengths and weaknesses in the existing sustainability appraisal standards, measures through which they can be tailored to resource efficiency and lifecycle environmental sustainability of the built environment are suggested.
Ajayi, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., & Dauda, J. A. (2019). Dynamic relationship between embodied and operational impacts of buildings. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 16(2), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-05-2018-0048
|Journal Article Type||Article|
|Acceptance Date||Dec 6, 2018|
|Online Publication Date||Jan 10, 2019|
|Journal||World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development|
|Peer Reviewed||Peer Reviewed|
|Keywords||sustainability, simulation, lifecycle analysis, BREAAM, CO2 emission, global warming potential|
|Additional Information||Additional Information : This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final published version is available here: http://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-05-2018-0048.|
Ajayi et al. (2019) - Dynamic Relationship between Embodied and Operational Impacts of Buildings.docx
Ajayi et al. %282019%29 - Dynamic Relationship between Embodied and Operational Impacts of Buildings.pdf
You might also like
Life cycle assessment approach for renewable multi-energy system: A comprehensive analysis
Deep learning model for demolition waste prediction in a circular economy